پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شمارهها | 1,138 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,758 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,876,759 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,492,325 |
الگوی پارادایمی عوامل مؤثر بر سیاستگذاری داده حکومتی باز در صنعت ورزشی ایران | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهشهای کاربردی در مدیریت ورزشی | ||
| دوره 12، شماره 2 - شماره پیاپی 46، مهر 1402، صفحه 93-110 اصل مقاله (1.31 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/arsm.2023.65304.3703 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عطا گلشنی1؛ مهدی کهندل* 2؛ سید نعمت خلیفه3؛ پریوش نوربخش4 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی ، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 3استادیار، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| 4استاد، گروه مدیریت ورزشی، واحد کرج، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، کرج، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| داده حکومتی باز موضوعی نو و جدید است که در دستور کار نهادهای بینالمللی و دولتهای توسعه یافته قرار گرفته و به دنبال بهرهگیری از ظرفیتهای مردمی در عرصه سیاستگذاری است. دستیابی به این مهم مستلزم شناسایی وضع موجود، تبیین وضع مطلوب و تحلیل شکاف بین دو وضع مطلوب و موجود است. یکی از حوزههای مهمی که نیازمند بهرهگیری از داده باز است، حوزه ورزش قهرمانی ایران است که در پژوهشهای پیشین به این حوزه توجه محدودی شده است، لذا پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی الگوی پارادایمی عوامل موثر بر سیاستگذاری داده حکومتی باز در صنعت ورزش ایران انجام شده است. این پژوهش از نوع کیفی بوده و از لحاظ هدف توسعهای-کاربردی است و از لحاظ ماهیت و شکل اجراء به صورت توصیفی-پیمایشی انجام شده است. جامعه آماری پژوهش شامل اعضای هیات علمی، سیاست گذاران و تصمیمگیران ورزش کشور در سطح کلان است و نمونهگیری با استفاده از روش گلولهبرفی صورت گرفت و در نهایت با 15 مصاحبه اشباع نظری رخ داد. ابزار گردآوری دادهها شامل مصاحبه نیمهساختاریافته بوده و جهت تحلیل مصاحبههای تخصصی از کدگذاری و روش تئوری داده بنیاد استفاده شد. بر اساس یافتهها، الگوی عوامل موثر بر سیاستگذاری داده حکومتی باز در صنعت ورزش ایران، طراحی شد. نتایج حاکی از آن است که این مدل دارای 6 بعد اصلی شامل شرایط علی (عدم توسعه ورزش، مشارکت پایین، ضعف خلاقیت و سیاستگذاری و...)، مداخلهگرها (عوامل نهادی، عوامل فرهنگی و اجتماعی، کانالهای توزیع اطلاعات، و...)، شرایط زمینهای (عوامل محیطی، عوامل قانونی و حقوقی، زیرساخت فنی ورزش ایران و...) | ||
| کلیدواژهها | ||
| سیاستگذاری داده حکومتی باز؛ صنعت ورزش ایران؛ مدل پارادایمی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Paradigm Model of Factors Affecting Open Government Data Policy in Iran's Sports Industry | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ata Golshani1؛ Mehdi Kohandel2؛ Seyed Nemat Khalifeh3؛ Parivash Nourbakhsh4 | ||
| 1PhD student, Department of Sports Management, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor, Department of Physical Education, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 3Assistant Professor, Sports Management Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| 4Professor, Sports Management Department, Karaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Karaj, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| One of the new approaches formed in the field of policy making and governance is the issue of open data governance policy. Achieving this goal requires identifying the existing situation, explaining the desired situation, and analyzing the gap between thetwo desired and existing situations. So the present study aimed to design a paradigm model of factors affecting open government data policy in the Iranian sports industry. This research is of qualitative type and is development-appliedpurpose. The statistical population includes academic faculty members, policy makers and sports decision makers in the country at the macro level Samplingwas done using the snowball method and finally theoretical saturation occurred with 15 interviews. Data collection tools included semi-structured interviews and coding was used to analyze the specialized inteviews. Based on the findings the model of the effective factors on open government data policy in Iran's sports industry and the paradigm model based on the paradigm model of Strauss and Corbin were designed. The results indicate that this model has 6 main dimensions including causal conditions (lack of sports development, low participation, poor creativity and policy-making, etc.), interveners (institutional factors, cultural and social factors, information distribution channels, etc.), backgroundconditions (environmental factors, legal factors, technical infrastructure of Iranian sports, etc.), central categories (growth and development of championship sports, financial processes, policy improvement, etc.), strategies (education and research, appropriate database, culturalization, etc.), and consequences (economic consequences, visible consequences of industry, socio-political consequences, etc.) Finally, 168 final codes, 62 concepts, 32 sub-categories and 6 main categories were formed by using the foundation's data theory method. With the analysis and back-and-forth that took place, adjustments were made in the initial answers, and the story line and concept selection criteria were formulated in each of the dimensions of the model. | ||
| کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
| Open Government Data Policy, Iran’s Sports Industry, Paradigm Model | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Abdulhosseinzadeh, M., Sanai, M., and Zulfiqarzadeh, M. (2017). The concept of open Government data policy and explain the advantages and benefits of the different policy fields. Strategic Studies of public policy, 7(22), 55-74. Aghaei, M., Sahebi, A. G., & Kordheydari, R. (2021). The Effect of Covid-19 on Sustainable Consumption Behavior in Chain Stores. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management and Technology (AJMT), 2(2), 35-51. Ansari, B., Barati, M., & Martin, E. G. (2021). Enhancing the usability and usefulness of open government data: A comprehensive review of the state of open government data visualization research. Government Information Quarterly, 101657. Bonina, C., & Eaton, B. (2020). Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo. Government Information Quarterly, 37(3), 101479. Corbin, J. (2021). Strauss’s Grounded Theory. In Developing Grounded Theory (pp. 25-44). Routledge. Fakhrabadi, J., Soleimani, S., and Abolghasemi, M. (2017). Analyzing the role of open data policy on policy optimization in Iran's higher education system. Management Research in Iran, 22(2), 103-126. Lee, J. (2001). A grounded theory: integration and internalization in ERP adoption and use. The University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Ghasemian Sahibi, A., Kordheidari, R., Aghaei, M. (2021). A comprehensive look at qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods in marketing research (from data to dissemination: examining concepts, tools and processes). (First Edition). Tehran: Arshadhan Publications. Ghasemian Sahibi, A., Mashbaki, A., Khodadad Hosseini, S. H. (2017). Investigating brand loyalty through customer engagement in online brand communities. Brand Management, 5(1), 13-34. Kordheidari, Raheel., Ghasemian Sahibi, Ali., and Aghaei, Mohammad. (2021). Investigating the relationship between perceived organizational support and employees' social organizational behaviors during the outbreak of the Covid-19 virus (case study: Refah chain stores company). Organizational resource management research. 11 (4), 113-136. Khurshid, M. M., Zakaria, N. H., Rashid, A., Ahmad, M. N., Arfeen, M. I., & Faisal Shehzad, H. M. (2020, September). Modeling of open government data for public sector organizations using the potential theories and determinants—a systematic review. In Informatics (Vol. 7, No. 3, p. 24). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute. Mansouri Moayed, Fereshte., Kordheidari, Raheel., and Ghasemian Sahibi, Ali. (2019). The role of knowledge brokers in the development of the technical knowledge marketing model of knowledge-based companies. Management Research in Iran, 24(2), 35-60. Nelson, L. K. (2020). Computational grounded theory: A methodological framework. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(1), 3-42. Purwanto, A., Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2020). Citizen engagement with open government data: Lessons learned from Indonesia’s presidential election. Transforming government: people, process and policy, 6(2), 82-95. Qalichkhani, M., and Abtahi, A. (2016). Providing a model for evaluating the readiness of open data activities. The third international conference on management, accounting and knowledge-based economy with emphasis on resistance economy. Reggi, L., & Dawes, S. S. (2022). Creating Open Government Data ecosystems: Network relations among governments, user communities, NGOs and the media. Government Information Quarterly, 101675. Sahebi, A. G., Kordheydari, R., & Aghaei, M. (2022). A New Approach in Marketing Research: Identifying the Customer Expected Value through Machine Learning and Big Data Analysis in the Tourism Industry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Management and Technology (AJMT), 2(3), 26-42. Saxena, S. (2017). Prospects of open government data (OGD) in facilitating the economic diversification of GCC region. Information and Learning Science, 3(4), 36-48. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2014). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage publications. Taslimi, M., Sanaei, M., & Abdolhosseinzadeh, M. (2017). Identify and Prioritize the Challenges of Achieving the Open Government Data Policy (OGDP): Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and Fuzzy TOPSIS. Public Policy, 3(2), 57-89. doi: 10.22059/ppolicy.2017.62830 Tahmasabi, Reza. (2011). Designing and compiling the talent management system in the organization (focusing on the capital market). Ph.D. Thesis. Faculty of Management and Human Sciences. University of Tehran. Vafai Moghadam, F., and Afshari, M. (2015). A research with the title of comparative study of public sports policy in developed countries and comparative study of public sports policy in developed countries and Iran. National Conference of the Scientific Association of Sports Management. Zhao, Y., & Fan, B. (2021). Understanding the key factors and configurational paths of the open government data performance: Based on fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101580 | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 248 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 256 |
||