
تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,143 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,835 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,105,204 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,652,572 |
بررسی رابطه کارکردهای اجرایی و قضاوت اخلاقی با میانجیگری نظریه ذهن کودکان 9 تا 11 ساله شهر ایلام | ||
شناخت اجتماعی | ||
مقاله 5، دوره 12، شماره 23، خرداد 1402، صفحه 53-65 اصل مقاله (897.44 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/sc.2023.69269.2919 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
آسیه مرادی* 1؛ کامران یزدانبخش2؛ زهرا مهدیان3 | ||
1استادیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
2دانشیار گروه روانشناسی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
3کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشگاه رازی، کرمانشاه، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف: کارکردهای اجرایی نقش مهمی در توسعه نظریه ذهن دارند. نظریه ذهن نیز در توانایی کودکان برای درک و تفسیر رفتار دیگران نقش اساسی دارد. همچنین رابطه مثبتی بین کارکردهای اجرایی و نظریه ذهن با قضاوت اخلاقی وجود دارد. ازین رو در پژوهش حاضر، هدف بررسی رابطه بین کارکردهای اجرایی و قضاوت اخلاقی با توجه به نقش میانجی نظریه ذهن است. روش: این مطالعه از نوع توصیفی- همبستگی مبتنی بر مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری است. جامعه آماری پژوهش کودکان ۹ تا ۱۱ ساله شهر ایلام است که 370 نفر به روش نمونهگیری دردسترس انتخاب شدند. از سه پرسشنامه قضاوت اخلاقی Sinha and Verma (1971)، نظریه ذهن Ghamrani و همکاران (2006) و کارکردهای اجرایی Barkley (2012) برای گردآوری اطلاعات استفاده شد. دادهها به روشهای همبستگی اسپیرمن و مدلیابی معادلات ساختاری با استفاده از نرمافزارهایSPSS نسخه 24 وsmart PLS نسخه 3 تحلیل شدند. یافتهها: بین کارکردهای اجرایی و قضاوت اخلاقی (246/0=β و 05/0>P)، کارکردهای اجرایی و نظریه ذهن (545/0=β و 05/0>P)، نظریه ذهن و قضاوت اخلاقی (494/0=β و 05/0>P) رابطه وجود دارد. همچنین نقش میانجی نظریه ذهن در رابطه بین کارکردهای اجرایی و قضاوت اخلاقی (269/0=β و 05/0>P) تایید شد. نتیجهگیری: کارکرد اجرایی، ظرفیت شناختی زیربنایی است که شناخت سطح بالاتر مانند استدلال و تصمیمگیری در موقعیتهای اخلاقی را ممکن میسازد و تسهیل میکند. همچنین کارکرد اجرایی بر ارتقای سطح نظریه ذهن نیز اثر دارد. بنابراین جهت بهبود قضاوت اخلاقی برنامههای مداخلهای که رشد کارکردهای اجرایی را هدف قرار دهند، باید مورد توجه بیشتری قرار گیرند؛ زیرا میتوان از طریق بهبود کارکردهای اجرایی، بستر مناسبی برای ارتقای سطح نظریه ذهن فراهم آورد و ارتقای نظریه ذهن بر پیشرفت قضاوتهای اخلاقی تأثیر خواهد گذاشت. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
قضاوت اخلاقی؛ نظریه ذهن؛ کارکردهای اجرایی؛ دانشآموزان | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Examining the Relationship between Executive Functions and MoralJudgment with the Mediation of Theory of Mind of 9-11-Year-Old Children in Ilam City | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Asie Moradi1؛ Kamran Yazdanbakhsh2؛ Zahra Mahdian3 | ||
1Assistant Professor of Psychology, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
2Associate Professor of Psychology, Razi University, Kermanshah, Iran. | ||
3MSc in Educational Psychology, Razi University. Kermanshah. Iran | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
Purpose: Since there is a positive relationship between executive functions and theory of mind with moral judgment, in the current research, the aim is to investigate the relationship between executive functions and moral judgment with regard to the mediating role of theory of mind. Method: This descriptive-correlation study was based on structural equation modeling. The statistical population of this research was 9 to 11-year-old children of Ilam City, and 370 of them were selected by convenience sampling method. Sinha and Verma's (1971) moral judgment questionnaire, Ghamrani et al.'s (2006) theory of mind, and Barkley's (2012) executive functions were used to collect information. The data were analyzed by Spearman's correlation and structural equation modeling using SPSS version 24 and Smart PLS version 3 software. Findings: The findings showed that there is a relationship between executive functions and moral judgment (β=0/246 % & P<0/05), executive functions and theory of mind (β=0/545 % & P<0/05), and theory of mind and moral judgment (β=0/494 % & P<0/05). Also, the mediating role of the theory of mind in the relationship between executive functions and moral judgment (β=0/269 % & P<0/05) was confirmed. Conclusion: Executive function is the underlying cognitive capacity that enables and facilitates higher level cognition such as reasoning and decision making in moral situations. Also, the executive function has an effect on improving the level of the theory of mind. Therefore, in order to improve moral judgment, intervention programs that target the development of executive functions should be given more attention; Because it is possible to provide a suitable platform for improving the level of the theory of mind through the improvement of executive functions, and the improvement of the theory of mind will affect the progress of moral judgments. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Moral Judgment, Theory of Mind, Executive Functions, Students | ||
مراجع | ||
Amiri, S., Ghasemi, A. & Azadmarzabadi, E. (2017). Moral Deciosion making and Executiive Function in Adolescent based on Individual Differences in Biological types of personality. Contemporary Psychology, 11(2): 81-93. (In Persian) Andreou, M., & Skrimpa, V. (2020). Theory of mind deficits and neurophysiological operations in autism spectrum disorders: a review. Brain sciences, 10(6), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10060393 Ashrafi, v. (2011). Moral relationship and executive functions of the brain. Master's thesis. Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences. Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran branch. (In Persian) Austin, G. Bondü, R. & Elsner, B. (2020). Executive Function, Theory of Mind, and Conduct-Problem Symptoms in Middle Childhood. Developmental Psychology, 11: 539. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020. 00539 Barkley, R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. New York: Guilford Press. Blair, C., Zelazo, P.D. & Greenberg, M. T. (2005). The measurement of executive function in early childhood. Journal of Developmental Neuropsychology, 28(2), 56171. Blankson, A. N., O'brien, M., Leerkes, E. M., Calkins, S. D., & Marcovitch, S. (2015). Do hours spent viewing television at ages 3 and 4 predict vocabulary and executive functioning at age 5? Merrill-palmer quarterly, 61(2), 264–289. Carlson, S. M., Claxton, L. J. & Moses, L. J. (2015). The relation between executive function and theory of mind is more than skin deep. Journal of Cognition and Development, 16, 186–197. Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J. & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between Executive function and Theory of Mind? Contributions on inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, 11, 73- 92. Carlson, S.M., Mandell, D.J. & Williams, L. (2004). Executive function and theory of mind: stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3. Dev Psychol;40(6):1105-22. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1105. Cristofani, C., Sesso, G., Cristofani, P., Fantozzi, P., Inguaggiato, E., Muratori, P., Narzisi, A., Pfanner, C., Pisano, S., Polidori, L., Ruglioni, L., Valente, E., Masi, G., Milone, A. (2020). The Role of Executive Functions in the Development of Empathy and Its Association with Externalizing Behaviors in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Other Psychiatric Comorbidities. Brain Sci, 10(8), 489. doi: 10.3390/brainsci10080489. Doherty, M. J. (2009). Theory of mind: How children understand others’ Thoughts and feeling. New York, Psychology Press. Friesen, K. (2019). Empathy and executive functioning in children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. Werklund School of Education, Ghadiri sourman abadi, F., Ebrahimzadeh, K., Anvari anbi, S., Ghazanfari, N. (2021). The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Empathy and Moral Judgment of Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Shefaye Khatam, 10(1): 45-55. (In Persian) Ghamrani, A., Alborzi, SH., & Khayer, M. (2006). VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE THEORY OF MIND TEST (TOM TEST) FOR USE IN IRAN. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 10(2): 181-199. (In Persian) Godfrey, D. A., Kehoe, C. M., Bastardas-Albero, A., & Babcock, J. C. (2020). Empathy mediates the relations between working memory and perpetration of intimate partner violence and aggression. Behavioral Sciences, 10(3): 63; https://doi.org/10.3390/bs10030063 Guadagnoli E, & Velicer WF. (1988).Relation of sample size to the stability of component patterns. Psychol Bull. 103(2):265-275. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.265. Hamid Nabi, H., Tape Rashi, A. and Mohammad Abdol-Karim Abdol-Ghader, H. (2023). Effectiveness of executive function training on sleep quality and moral judgment of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. The culture of counseling and psychotherapy. doi: 10.22054/qccpc. 2023.72653.3088 (In Persian) Hinnant, J.B., Nelson, J.A., O’Brien, M., Keane, S.P., and Calkins, S.D. (2013).The interactive roles of parenting, emotion regulation and executive functioning in moral reasoning during middle childhood. Cognition and Emotion. 27, 1460–1468. Hughes, C., & Devine, R. T. (2015). A social perspective on theory of mind. In M. E. Lamb & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science: Socioemotional processes (pp. 564–609). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Khakpour, M., & Mehrafarid, M. (2013). Moral Judgment in Preschool Children. Thinking and Children, 3(5): 1-14. (In Persian) Killen, M., & Smetana, J. (2008). Moral judgment and moral neuroscience: intersections, definitions and issues. Child development perspectives, 2(1), 1-6. Killen, M., Lynn Mulvey, K., Richardson, C., Jampol, N., Woodward, A. (2011). The accidental transgressor: morally-relevant theory of mind. Cognition, 119(2):197-215. doi: 10.1016/j. cognition. 2011.01.006. Kochanska, G., Murray, K.T., and Harlan, E.T. (2000). Effortful control in early childhood: continuity and change, antecedents, and implications for social development. Developmental Psychology. 36, 220–232. Lahat, A., Degnan, K.A., White, L.K., McDermott, J.M., Henderson, H.A., Lejuez, C.W., Fox, N.A. (2012). Temperamental exuberance and executive function predict propensity for risk taking in childhood. Dev Psychopathol; 24(3):847-56. doi: 10.1017/ S09545 79412000405. Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., Olson, S. L., LaBounty, J., & Kerr, D. C. (2010). Theory of mind and emotion understanding predict moral development in early childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28(4). ), 871-889. Mikaeili, N., & Esmaeili, M. (2016). Comparison theory of mind and executive function in the students with learning disabilities and normal. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 6(21): 81-100. doi: 10.22054/jpe. 2016.5282. (In Persian) Miller, M., & Hinshaw, S.P. (2010). Does childhood executive function predict adolescent functional outcomes in girls with ADHD? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 38, 315–326. Mohd Yusoff, M. Z., Hamzah, A., Fajri, I., Za, T., & Yusuf, S. M. (2022). The effect of spiritual and social norm in moral judgement. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 27(1), 555-568. Muris, P., Streeneman, P., Meesters, C., Marckelbacg, H., Horselenberg, R., Van Den-Hogen, T. & Vand Dongen, L. (1999). The tom test: A new instrument disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(1), 67-80. Naderi, M., & Mohaddes Pour, M. (2021). The Role Of Theory Of Mind In Projecting Moral Judgment Of Children Aged Between 7 And 10. Elementary Education Online, 20(6), 1065-1073. Negi, R. (2021). Cognitive Processes of Victims of Bullying. International Journal of Bullying Prevention, 1-13. Pourfahimi A, Eshghi Abkenari S. (2022). Examining the Relationship Between Executive Functions and Theory of Mind with Behavioral Problems in Children with Hearing Impairment. MEJDS, 12: 255-255. (In Persian) Premack. D. & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav Brain Sci, 1(4), 515-26. Roca, M. (2016). The relationship between Executive Functions and Theory of Mind: a Long and Winding Road. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry; 87229. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1136/jnnp-2015-312568. Russell, J. (1996). Agency: Its role in mental development Hove. England: Erlbaum. Schurz, M., Radua, J., Tholen, M. G., Maliske, L., Margulies, D. S., Mars, R. B., Sallet, J., & Kanske, P. (2021). Toward a hierarchical model of social cognition: A neuroimaging meta-analysis and integrative review of empathy and theory of mind. Psychological Bulletin, 147(3), 293. https://doi.org/10. 1037/ bul000030 Seif, S., Lotfabadi, H., Karami Nouri, R. and Kadivar, P. (2015). Psychology 1, vol. 1. Tehran: Somit Publications. Twenty-sixth edition. (In Persian) Seucan, D. T. & Visu-Petra, L. (2023). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THEORY OF MIND AND CHILDREN’S MORAL JUDGMENT: A SCOPING REVIEW. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai - Psychologia-Paedagogia, 32(1): 29-60. Sinha, D., Verma, M. (1971). Moral Judgment Test. National Psychological Corporation, Agra, Uttar Prasdesh, India. Soltani Kouh Banani, M. H., Zarenezhad, S., & Abazari, K. (2018). Psychometric Properties of Barkley's Children and Adolescent Functional Performance Scale. Psychology of Exceptional Individuals, 8(30): 19-45. doi: 10.22054/jpe.2018.9209 (In Persian) Steerneman, W. J. P. J. M. (1999). Theory-of-mind-screening-schaal. Garant 1994. Taghizadeh, H., Soltani, A., Manzari Tavakoli, H. & Zeinaddiny Maeymand, Z. (2017). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RESPONSE INHIBITION EXECUTIVE FUNCTION AND WORKING MEMORY SPAN OF MENTAL COMPETENCE THEORY OF MIND IN CHILDREN 7 TO 12 YEARS OF PRIMARY SCHOOL. (JOURNAL OF HEALTH BREEZE) FAMILY HEALTH, 5(3): 31-40. (In Persian) Wellman, H.M. & Liu, D. (2004). Scaling of theory-of-mind tasks. Child Dev; 75(2): 523-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624. 2004. 00691.x. Xiao, E. Shen, J. & Harris, P. (2020). Children with siblings differ from only children in their sharing behaviour, Early Child Development and Care, DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2020.1829610 Yaghoobi, A., & Bayat, T. (2016). Investigating the Influence of Mental States Instruction on the Moral Judgment in the 5th Grade Female Primary Students of Hamedan. Educational Psychology, 12(42): 173-187. doi: 10.22054/jep.2016.7388. (In Persian) Zare, H., Malekzadeh, A., Aghayousefi, A., GholamAli Lavasani, M. (2020). The explanatory model of social judgment: the role of mind theory by mediating personality rraits. Journal of Psychological Science. 19(85): 121-128. (In Persian) Zelazo, P. D., Qu, L., & Müller, U. Hot and cool aspects of executive function: Relations in early development.In R. xecutive function: Relations in early development.In R. Schneider, Wolfgang; Schumann-Hengsteler (Ed.), Young Children’s Cognitive Development: Interrelationships Among Executive Functioning, Working Memory, Verbal Ability and Theory of Mind (pp.71– 95). 2005, Mahwah, New Jesrsey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Zendieh, A. (2013). Determining the psychometric characteristics of moral judgment test (MJT) of 8-11 year old students and its relationship with moral intelligence. Master's thesis, Islamic Azad University, Central Tehran branch. (In Persian) | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 310 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 264 |