تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,131 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,681 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,634,143 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,307,029 |
ساخت و اعتباریابی پرسشنامه خرد در ایران: یک دیدگاه یکپارچه از عوامل پیشایندی، پسایندی و همبسته خرد | ||
شناخت اجتماعی | ||
مقاله 9، دوره 11، شماره 22، آذر 1401، صفحه 91-108 اصل مقاله (695.37 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/sc.2024.68355.2897 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
مهدی دستا1؛ امید شکری* 2؛ شهلا پاکدامن3؛ جلیل فتح آبادی3 | ||
1دکتری روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
2استادیار گروه روان شناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
3دانشیار روانشناسی تربیتی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
چکیده | ||
این پژوهش با هدف ساخت و اعتباریابی پرسشنامه خرد با توجه به ابعاد، مقولهها و مولفههای الگوی خرد در جامعه ایران انجام شد. جامعه پژوهش شامل افراد بالای 20 سال ایرانی بود. 985 نفر از گروههای مختلف قومی، جنسیتی، سنی و تحصیلی به کمک روش نمونهگیری خوشهای تصادفی انتخاب شدند. نتایج تحلیل عامل تاییدی نشان داد که ساختار 6 بعدی خرد یعنی عوامل علی (مهارتها و تواناییهای شناختی، هوش هیجانی و ویژگیهای شخصیتی)، مقوله اصلی (یکپارچگی، هماهنگی و تعادل ابعادی وجودی)، شرایط زمینهای (دینداری، معنویت و تعالی خود، اخلاق، تامل و تجارب چالشانگیز)، شرایط مداخلهگر (عوامل محیطی، نظام آموزش رسمی و غیررسمی و خانواده)، راهبردها (استدلال خردمندانه، نگرش و رفتارهای جامعهپسند، بهزیستی، مشاوره، راهنمایی و رهبری دیگران) و پیامدها (کمال و سعادت انسان، خیر مشترک و جهانی عادلانهتر) با دادهها برازش مناسبی داشتند. بهطور کلی خرد را میتوان بهعنوان صفت منحصربهفرد، پیچیده و چندمولفهای انسانی تعریف کرد که یکپارچگی پویا و متعادل مولفههای مختلف را در بر میگیرد. باید اذعان داشت توصیف خرد بهعنوان بهترین بودن در همه ابعاد، موجب شود بسیاری آن را یک ایدهال غیرقابل دسترس ادراک کنند، در حالی که خرد را میتوان بهعنوان یک پیوستار در نظر گرفت که افراد ممکن است در طیفی از خیلی کم تا خیلی زیاد در ارتباط با این ابعاد قرار گیرند. این ابعاد بهصورت همافزایی در مسیر افزایش سطح خرد عمل میکنند و در واقع میتوان گفت خرد بزرگتر از جمع اجزای آن است. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
خرد؛ یکپارچگی؛ تعادل؛ اعتبار؛ روایی | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Construction and Validation of Wisdom Questionnaire in Iran: An Integrated Approach to its Antecedents, Consequences and Concomitants | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
Mahdi Dasta1؛ omid shokri2؛ shahla pakdaman3؛ jalil fathabadi3 | ||
1Ph.D. of Educational Psychology, faculty of psychology and education, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran, Iran. | ||
2Assistant Professor, Department of Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
3Associate Prof. of Educational Psychology, faculty of psychology and education, Shahid Beheshti University. Tehran, Iran. | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
This study intended to construct and validate a wisdom questionnaire in Iran with regard to its dimensions, categories and components in the context. All above-20 Iranians comprised the population. Using random cluster sampling, 985 Iranians with different ethnic, gender, age and academic backgrounds were selected. Confirmatory factor analysis revealed that a 6 dimensional structure of wisdom fits the data. The dimensions were Causal Factors (cognitive skills and abilities, emotional intelligence, and personality characteristics), Core Category (existential integrity, harmony and equilibrium), Context Conditions (religiousness, spirituality, self-excellence, ethics, reflection, and challenging experiences), Intervening Conditions (environmental factors, official and unofficial education system, and family), Strategies (wise reasoning, prosocial attitude and behaviors, wellbeing, consulting, guiding and leading others), and Consequences (human perfection and flourishing, common good and a more just world). Overall, wisdom can be defined as a unique, complex, and multifaceted feature encompassing dynamic integrity and balanced account of different components. To describe wisdom as being the best in all its dimensions makes it an unachievable-for-many ideal but if viewed as a continuum, then individuals’ wisdom can be seen as ranging from much/many to less/few of its dimensions. In fact, wisdom dimensions work in a synergic manner to promote it and its sum is greater than its parts. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
wisdom, integrity, equilibrium, validity, reliability | ||
مراجع | ||
اسعدی، م. (1394). ویژگیهای افراد خردمند بر پایه نظریههای ضمنی: با نگاهی بر تفاوتهای گروههای سنی و جنسیتی. پژوهشنامه روانشناسی مثبت، شماره 1، 66-51.
دستا، م.، شکری، ا.، پاکدامن، ش. و فتحآبادی، ج (1399). مفهوم خرد در جامعه ایران. فصلنامه تحقیقات فرهنگی ایران، 13(3)، 99-69.
دستا، م.، شکری، ا.، پاکدامن، ش. و فتحآبادی، ج (1399). فهم خرد در جامعه ایرانی: نقش قومیت، جنسیت، سن و تحصیلات. پژوهشنامه روانشناسی مثبت، 23، 32-13. دستا، م.، شکری، ا.، پاکدامن، ش. و فتحآبادی، ج (1400). شناسایی و سنجش مولفهها و مدل مفهومی خرد در جامعه ایرانی: آزمون مدلهای رقیب (رساله دکتری). دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
کرد نوقابی، ر. و دلفان بیرانوند، آ. (1395). نظریههای ضمنی خرد در ایران: بررسی پدیدارشناختی. پژوهشنامه روانشناسی اسلامی، شماره 2(3)، 105-78.
Aldwin, C. M., & Levenson, M. R (2019). The Practical Applications of self-Transcendent wisdom. In In R. J. Sternberg., H. C, Nusbaum & J. Glück, Applying Wisdom to Contemporary World Problems. Palgrave Macmilan.
Ardelt, M. (2003). Empirical assessment of a three-dimensional wisdom scale. Research on Aging, 25, 275–324
Ardelt, M. (2008). Being wise at any age. In S. J. Lopez (Ed.), Positive psychology: Exploring the best in people (Vol. 1: Discovering human strengths, pp. 81–108). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Baltes, P. B., & Staudinger, U. M. (2000). Wisdom. A metaheuristic (pragmatic) to orchestrate mind and virtue toward excellence. American Psychologist, 55, 122–136.
Bangen, K. J., Meeks, T. W., & Jeste, D. V. (2013). Defining and assessing wisdom: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 1254–1266.
Beer, J. S., Knight, R. T., & D’Esposito, M. (2016). Controlling the integration of emotion and cognition. Psychological Science, 17(5), 448–453.
Bluck, S., & Glück, J. (2004). Making things better and learning a lesson: Experiencing wisdom across the lifespan. Journal of Personality, 72, 543–572.
Brienza, J. P., Kung, F. Y. H., Santos, H. C., Bobocel, D. R., & Grossmann, I. (2018). Wisdom, bias, and balance: Toward a process-sensitive measurement of wisdom-related cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(6), 1093–1126.
Brown, S. C., & Greene, J. A. (2006). The Wisdom Development Scale: Translating the conceptual to the concrete. Journal of College Student Development, 47, 1–19.
Chen, L. M., Cheng, Y. Y., Wu, P. J., & Hsueh, H. I. (2014). Educators’ implicit perspectives on wisdom: A comparison between interpersonal and intrapersonal perspectives. International Journal of Psychology, 49(6), 425–433.
Clayton, V. P., & Birren, J. E. (1980). The development of wisdom across the life-span: A reexamination of an ancient topic. In P. B. Baltes & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-Span Development and Behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 103–35). New York, NY: Academic Press
Dennis, T. A. (2010). Introduction to the special issue on neurophysiological markers for emotion and emotion regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 35(2), 125–128.
Erikson, E. H. (1984). Reflections on the last stage and the first. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 39, 155–65.
Ferrari, M., Abdelaal, Y., Lakhani, S., Sachdeva, S., Tasmim, S., & Sharma, D.(2016). Why is Gandhi wise? A cross-cultural comparison of Gandhi as an exemplar of wisdom. Journal of Adult Development, 23, 204–13.
Germer, C., & Siegel, R. (Eds.). (2012). Wisdom and compassion in psychotherapy. New York, NY: Guilford Press
Glück, J. (2019). The development of wisdom during adulthood. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück, Cambridge Handbook of Wisdom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Glück, J., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Using the concept of wisdom to enhance the expression of wisdom knowledge: Not the philosopher’s dream but differential effects of developmental preparedness. Psychology and Aging, 21, 679–90.
Glück, J., & Bluck, S. (2011). Laypeople’s conceptions of wisdom and its development: Cognitive and integrative views. The Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 66, 321-324.
Glück, J., Bischof, B., & Siebenhüner, L. (2012). “Knows what is good and bad”, “Can teach you things”, “Does lots of crosswords”: Children’s knowledge about wisdom. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9, 582–598.
Glück, J., Bluck, S., Baron, J., & Mcadams, D. P. (2005). The wisdom of experience: Autobiographical narratives across adulthood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 29(3), 197–208.
Glück, J., König, S., Naschenweng, K., Redzanowski, U., Dorner, L., Straßer, I., & Wiedermann, W. (2013). How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Frontiers in Psychology, 4:405, 1-13
Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1–26.
Grossmann, I. (2017a). Wisdom and how to cultivate it: Review of emerging evidence for a constructivist model of wise thinking. European Psychologist, 22, 233–46.
Grossmann, I., Dorfman, A., & Oakes, H. (2020). Wisdom is a social-ecological rather than person-centric phenomenon. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 66–71.
Holliday, S. G., & Chandler, M. J. (1986). Wisdom: Explorations in adult competence. Contributions to Human Development, 17, 1–96.
Jason, L. A., Reichler, A., King, C., Madsen, D., Camacho, J., & Marchese, W. (2001). The measurement of wisdom: A preliminary effort. Journal Of Community Psychology, 29, 585–98.
Jason, L. A., Reichler, A., King, C., Madsen, D., Camacho, J., & Marchese, W. (2001). The measurement of wisdom: A preliminary effort. Journal of Community Psychology, 29(5), 585–98.
Jeste, D. V., & Lee, E. E. (2019). The Emerging Empirical Science of Wisdom: Definition, Measurement, Neurobiology, Longevity, and Interventions. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 27(3), 127–140.
Jeste, D. V., & Vahia, I. (2008). Comparison of the conceptualization of wisdom in ancient Indian literature with modern views: Focus on the Bhagavad Gita. Psychiatry, 71, 197–209.
Kilburg, R. R. (2012). Virtuous Leaders: Strategy, Character, and Influence in the 21st Century (1st ed.). American Psychological Association.
Kohlberg, L. (1984). The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages. In: Essays on moral development (Vol. 2). New York, NY: Harper & Row.
König, S., & Glück, J. (2012). Situations in which I was wise: Autobiographical wisdom memories of children and adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22, 512–525.
Kunzmann, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2003). Wisdom-related knowledge: Affective, motivational, and interpersonal correlates. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1104–19.
Kunzmann, U., & Baltes, P. B. (2005). The psychology of wisdom: Theoretical and empirical challenges. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Jordan (Eds.), Handbook of wisdom (pp. 110–135). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Labouvie-Vief, G., & Marquez, M. G. (2004). Dynamic integration: Affect optimization and differentiation in development. In D. Y. Dai & J. Sternberg (Eds.), Motivation, emotion, and cognition: Integrative perspectives on intellectual functioning and development (pp. 237–72). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lee, S. Choun, S., Aldwin, C. M., & Levenson, M. R. (2015). Cross-cultural comparison of self-transcendent wisdom between the United States and Korea. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 30, 143–61.
Levenson, M. R., Jennings, P. A., Aldwin, C. M., & Shiraishi, R. W. (2005). Selftranscendence: Conceptualization and measurement. International Journal of Aging & Human Development, 60, 127–43.
Montgomery, A., Barber, C., & McKee, P. (2002). A phenomenological study of wisdom in later life. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 52, 139–57.
Moraitou, D., & Efklides, A. (2012). The Wise Thinking and Acting Questionnaire: The cognitive facet of wisdom and its relation with memory, affect, and hope. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(5), 849–73.
Staudinger, U. M., & Glück, J. (2011). Psychological wisdom research: Commonalities and differences in a growing field. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 215–241.
Staudinger, U. M., Maciel, A. G., Smith, J., & Baltes, P. B. (1998). What predicts wisdom-related performance? A first look at personality, intelligence, and facilitative experiential contexts. European Journal of Personality, 12, 1–17.
Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 607–627.
Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Wisdom: Its nature, origins and development. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Sternberg, R. J. (2010). WICS: A new model for school psychology. School Psychology International, 31(6), 599–616.
Sternberg, R. J., & Glück, J. (2019). Wisdom, morality, and ethics. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück, Cambridge handbook of wisdom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Second Edition: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Takahashi, M. (2019). Relationship between wisdom and spirituality: An expanded theoretical model with mysticism and gerotranscendence. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Glück, Cambridge handbook of wisdom. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, M., Bates, G., & Webster, J. D. (2011). Comparing the psychometric properties of two measures of wisdom: Predicting forgiveness and psychological well-being with the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (SAWS) and the Three-Dimensional Wisdom Scale (3D-WS). Experimental Aging Research, 37, 129–41.
Thomas, M. L., Bangen, K. J., Palmer, B. W., Sirkin Martin, A., Avanzino, J. A., Depp, C. A., Glorioso, D., Daly, R. E., & Jeste, D. V. (2019). A new scale for assessing wisdom based on common domains and a neurobiological model: The San Diego Wisdom Scale (SD-WISE). Journal of Psychiatric Research, 108, 40–47.
Tirri, K. (2010). Combining excellence and ethics: Implications for moral education for the gifted. Roeper Review, 33, 59–64
Webster, J. D. (2003). An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Journal of Adult Development, 10, 13–22
Weststrate, N. M., Ferrari, M., & Ardelt, M. (2016). The many faces of wisdom: An investigation of cultural-historical wisdom exemplars reveals practical, philosophical, and benevolent prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42, 662–76
Yang, S.-Y. (2001). Conceptions of wisdom among Taiwanese Chinese. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 32, 662–80.
Yaniv, I., & Choshen-Hillel, S. (2011). Exploiting the Wisdom of Others to Make Better Decisions: Suspending Judgment Reduces Egocentrism and Increases Accuracy. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 25(5), 427-434. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 123 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 120 |