پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,189 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,225 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 19,273,005 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,315,087 |
تاثیر ایجاد اعتبار به روش برچسب زنی بر میزان همنوایی حافظه دیداری | ||
| شناخت اجتماعی | ||
| مقاله 10، دوره 11، شماره 22، آذر 1401، صفحه 109-120 اصل مقاله (693.02 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/sc.2024.69254.2918 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| سهیلا سهرابی1؛ جواد صالحی* 2؛ طاهره الهی2 | ||
| 1کارشناسی ارشد روانشناسی عمومی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| 2دانشیار روانشناسی، دانشگاه زنجان، زنجان، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف پژوهش حاضر تعیین تاثیر ایجاد اعتبار برای شریک به روش برچسب زنی بر میزان همنوایی حافظه دیداری بود. در این پژوهش میزان همنوایی حافظه بازشناسی 64 شرکت کننده بر اساس طرح «پیش آزمون-پس آزمون با گروه کنترل» بررسی شد. ابتدا در مرحله ی پیش آزمون سطح واقعی عملکرد انفرادی حافظه بازشناسی دیداری شرکت کنندگان با استفاده از سیستم بینالمللی تصاویر عاطفی (IAPS) برآورد شد. سپس شرکت کنندگان گروه آزمایش در حضور یک هم-شاهد متخصص )همدست پژوهشگر) که با زدن برچسب افسر پلیس معتبر شده بود، و شرکت کنندگان گروه کنترل در حضور هم-شاهد غیر متخصص (همدست پژوهشگر) در تکالیف بازشناسی تصاویر شرکت کردند. تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از تحلیل کوواریانس یک طرفه نشان داد که شرکت کنندگان گروه آزمایش بیشتر از گروه گواه با هم-شاهد معتبر همنوایی کردند (88/0η p 2 = و005/0 < p و 35/19 = (58) F). در مجموع، نتایج نشان داد که ارائه اطلاعات در مورد تخصص یک هم-شاهد میتواند بر همنوایی حافظه با او اثر داشته باشد. معلوم شد که ارزیابی فرد از اعتبار حافظه شریک مهمترین نقش را در این میان بازی میکند. به نظر میرسد ادراک فرد از میزان اعتبار هم-شاهد بر نحوه پردازش اطلاعات جدید توسط او اثر میگذارد که این امر به خاطر اسنادهای اشتباه در فرایند نظارت بر منبع منجر به افزایش همنوایی میشود. همچنین نفوذ اجتماعی نیز سهمی در تاثیر اعتبار دارد، البته نه برای اعتبار بخشی به خاطرات بلکه از نظر نحوه استفاده از اطلاعات. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| اعتبار شریک؛ حافظه دیداری؛ فشارگروهی؛ همنوایی حافظه | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Effect of Creating Credibility by Labeling Method on the Consistency of Visual Memory | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| soheyla sohrabi1؛ Javad Salehi2؛ Tahere Elahi2 | ||
| 1M.Sc. general psychology, University of Zanjan , Zanjan, Iran. | ||
| 2Associate Professor of psychology department, university of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Abstract: The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of creating credibility for the co-witness by labeling, on the conformity of visual memory. In this research, the conformity of the recognition memory of 64 participants was investigated based on the "pretest-posttest control group design". First, in the pre-test step, the actual level of visual recognition memory performance of the individual participants was measured using the International Affective Picture System (IAPS). Then, the participants of the experimental group participated in image recognition tasks in the presence of an expert co-witness (researcher's confederate) who was validated by the labeling him a police officer, and the participants of the control group in the presence of a non-expert co- witness (researcher's confederate). Data analysis using one way analysis of covariance showed that the participants of the experimental group conformed with the valid co-witness more than the control group (ηp2 =0.88, p < 0.005 and F = (58) 19.35). In conclusion, the results showed that providing information about the expertise of a co-witness can have an effect on memory conformity with him. It turned out that the person's assessment of the validity of the co-witness's memory plays the most important role. It seems that a person's perception of the credibility of a co-witness affects the way he processes new information, which leads to an increase in conformity due to wrong attributions in the source monitoring process. Social influence also plays a role in the credibility effect, though not in terms of giving credibility to memories, but in terms of how information is used. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Group Pressure, Memory Compliance, Partner Credibility, Visual Memory | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Allan, K., Midjord, J.P., Martin, D. et al. (2012). Memory conformity and the perceived accuracy of self-versus other. Memory& cognition, (40), 280–286.
Baduria, C. M. (2022). Reintegration into Society Post-Exoneration: A Clinical Application for Wrongfully Convicted and Exonerated Individuals (Doctoral dissertation, Azusa Pacific University).
Baron, R.A., Byrne, D., Branscombe, N.R. (2006). Social Psychology; Translation: Youssef Karimi (2015) Ravan Publishing House, Tehran. (in persian)
Bartlett, G., Albery, I., Frings, D., Gawrylowicz, J. (2022). The effects of alcohol and co-witness information on memory reports: a field study. Psychopharmacology, (239), 2945–2953.
Blank, H. (2009). Remembering: A theoretical interface between memory and Social Psychology. Social Psychology, (40), 164–175.
Cyr, T. G., & Hirst, W. (2019). Reflections on conversations and memory. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(4), 831-837.
Dodd, D. H., & Bradshaw, J. M. (1980). Leading questions and memory: Pragmatic constraints. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19(6), 695-704.
Fathi, P. (2013). The effect of experimental creation of credibility for the partner on the level of memory consistency: Is this credibility transferable to other areas? Master's thesis. Zanjan University. (in persian)
Gabbert, F., Memon, A., & Wright, D. B. (2007). I saw it for longer than you: The relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity. Acta Psychologica, (124), 319–331.
Gabbert, F., Wright, D. B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E. M., & Jamieson, K. (2012). Memory conformity between eyewitnesses. Court Review, (48), 36–43.
Goodwin, K. A., Hannah, P. J., Nicholl, M. C., & Ferri, J. M. (2017). The Confident Co-witness: The Effects of Misinformation on Memory After Collaborative Discussion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31(2), 225–235.
Granhag, P., Ask, K., & Rebelius, A. (2005). ‘I saw the man who killed Anna Lindh’: A case study of eyewitness descriptions. Paper presented at the European Law and Psychology Meeting, Vilnuis.
Horry, R., Palmer, M. A., Sexton, M. L., Brewer, N. (2012). Memory conformity for confidently recognized items: The power of social influence on memory reports. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, (48), 783–786.
Jalbert, M.C. Wulff, A.N. Hyman Jr, I.E. (2021). Stealing and sharing memories: Source monitoring biases following collaborative remembering. International Journal of Cognitive Science, Volume (211), 104656.
Johnson, M. K., Hashtroui, S., & Lindsay, D.S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin,114(1), 3-28.
Lang, P.J., Bradley, M.M., & Cuthbert, B.N. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Digitized photographs, instruction manual and affective ratings. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida
Mc Carroll, C.J. (2020). Remembering the Personal Past: Beyond the Boundaries of Imagination. Front. Psychol. (11):585352.
Mohammad Hossein Abdullahi, Hossein Zare (2019). Cognitive Psychology, Samt Publications. (in persian)
Mojtahedi, D., Ioannou, M., Hammond, L. (2018). The Dangers of Co witness Familiarity: Investigating the Effects of Co-witness Relationships on Blame Conformity. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, (33), 316–326.
Mojtahedi, D., Ioannou, M., & Hammond, L. (2018). Group size, misinformation and unanimity influences on co-witness judgements. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 1–22.
Rechdan, J., Hope, L., Sauer, J. D., Sauerland, M., Ost, J., & Merckelbach, H. (2018). The effects of co-witness discussion on confidence and precision in eyewitness memory reports. Memory, 26(7), 904–912.
Salovich, N. A., & Rapp, D. N. (2022). How susceptible are you? Using feedback and monitoring to reduce the influence of false information. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
Schacter, DL (2001) The Seven Sins of Memory: How the Mind Forgets and Remembers. New York and Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Skagerberg, EM., Wright, DB. (2008). Manipulating power can affect memory conformity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, (22), 207–216.
Szpitalak, M. (2022). Reinforced self-affirmation as a method of reducing the misinformation effect: Towards ecological validity. Psychology, Crime & Law, 1-29.
Thorley, C. (2015). Blame Conformity: Innocent Bystanders Can Be Blamed for a Crime as a Result of Misinformation from a Young, but Not Elderly, Adult Co-Witness. PLoS ONE, (10), e0134739.
Thorley, C., & Kumar, D. (2016). Eyewitness susceptibility to co-witness misinformation is influenced by co-witness confidence and own self-confidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 23(4), 342–360.
Wright D. B., Self G., & Justice C (2000). Memory conformity: Exploring misinformation effects when presented by another person. British Journal of Psychology, (91), 189–202.
Wright, D.B., Memon, A., Skagerberg, E.M., Gabbert, F. (2009). When eyewitnesses talk. Current Directions in Psychological Science, (18), 174–178.
Wright, D. B., London, K., & Waechter, M. (2010). Social anxiety moderates' memory conformity in adolescents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, (24), 1034–1045. Vo, T. V. A., Gunderson, C. A., & ten Brinke, L. (2021). How deception and believability feedback affect recall. Memory, 1–9.
Williamson, P., Weber, N., Robertson, MT. (2013). The Effect of Expertise on Memory Conformity: A Test of Informational Influence. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, (31), 607-623.
Xu, Y., Margolin, D., & Niederdeppe, J. (2021). Testing strategies to increase source credibility through strategic message design in the context of vaccination and vaccine hesitancy. Health communication, 36(11), 1354-1367. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 490 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 220 |
||