پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,131 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,681 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,623,321 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,301,924 |
آموزش رو در رو در مقابل آموزش الکترونیکی: تحقیق درباره عملکرد دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد آموزش رو در رو و آموزش الکترونیکی رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی در دانشگاه پیام نور | ||
| فصلنامه علمی پژوهش در یادگیری آموزشگاهی و مجازی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 3، شماره 11، اسفند 1394، صفحه 49-58 اصل مقاله (178.02 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پژوهشی | ||
| نویسنده | ||
| فاطمه همتی* | ||
| آموزش زبان انگلیسی، دانشگاه پیام نور | ||
| چکیده | ||
| هدف از این مطالعه مقایسه عملکرد دانشجویان کارشناسی ارشد رشته آموزش زبان انگلیسی در سیستم آموزش الکترونیکی و آموزش رو در رو در دانشگاه پیام نور، بزرگ‌ترین دانشگاه دولتی ایران و بزرگ‌ترین موسسه آموزش از راه دور خاورمیانه بود. به این منظور، عملکرد 1254 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد شامل 678 دانشجوی آموزش رو در رو و 576 دانشجوی الکترونیکی در 5 درس مقایسه شد. همچنین عملکرد 158 دانشجوی مرد با 418 دانشجوی زن در آموزش الکترونیکی برای پیدا کردن تفاوت قابل‌توجه در عملکرد آن‌ها مقایسه شد. نتایج نشان داد که دانشجویان آموزش الکترونیکی زن و مرد در امتحانات پایان ترم تفاوت قابل‌ملاحظه‌ای ندارند. همچنین دو گروه دانشجویان رو در رو و آموزش الکترونیکی در سه درس از پنج درس مقایسه شده تفاوت قابل‌ملاحظه‌ای نداشتند. اما در دو درس دانشجویان آموزش رو در رو به طور قابل‌ملاحظه‌ای از دانشجویان الکترونیکی پیشی گرفتند. دلایل اختلاف بین دو گروه دانشجویان می‌تواند به عواملی مثل اختلاف در دو نحوه آموزش، کیفیت نرم‌افزار و سخت‌افزار در آموزش الکترونیکی، و تعداد زیاد دانشجویان در کلاس‌های الکترونیکی باشند که لزوم توجه هر چه بیشتر مسئولان به این آموزش در دانشگاه پیام نور را می‌طلبد. بر اساس نتایج کاربردهای نظری و عملی ارائه شد. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| آموزش الکترونیکی؛ آموزش رو در رو؛ عملکرد | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Face to Face versus E-learning: An Investigation into the Performance of TEFL Master's Students of Payame Noor University | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Fatemeh Hemmati | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| This study aimed at investigating the performance of face-to-face and e-learning Master's students of Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) at Payame Noor University, the biggest distance education institute and public university in Iran and the Middle East. To achieve this, the performance of 1254 MA (678 face-to-face and 576 e-learning) students in the final exams of five courses were compared. In another comparison, the final scores of male (n=158) and female (n=418) e-learning students were compared to find any significant differences in their performances. The results revealed no significant difference between the achievements of male and female students. Furthermore, the face-to-face and electronic students performed similarly in three courses and differed significantly in two other ones. That is, the former group outperformed the latter in two courses. The reasons might be due to some factors such as differences in the two modes of learning, the quality of hardware and software, and the number of students in e-learning courses which highlight the necessity of paying more attention to this mode of learning. Some theoretical and pedagogical implications emerged from the study. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| E-Learning, Face-to-face Learning, performance | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Amanzade, Amene; Nomanof, Mansour. (2015). Studying the influence of training based on web and computer and mobile learning on students' critical thinking skills and creative thinking in students of Mazandaran province universities. Journal of research in school and virtual learning. 3, 9, 57 -68Chingos, M., Schwerdt, G. (2014). Virtual Schooling and Student Learning: Evidence from the Florida Virtual School. Program on Education Policy and Governance Working Papers Series. Pp. 3-14.
Chyung, S. Y. (2007). Age and gender differences in online behavior, self-efficacy and academic performance. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8, 3, 213-222.
Daymont. T. & Blau, G. (2008). Student Performance in Online and Traditional Sections of an Undergraduate Management Course. Institute of Behavioral and Applied Management, pp. 275-294.
Deerajviset, P., & Harbon, L. (2014). E-learning in EFL education in Thailand’s higher education: The role for lecturers making it work. University of Sydney Papers in TESOL, 9, 37-63.
Dell, C., A., Low, Ch., Wilker, J. F. (2010). Comparing student achievement in online and face-to-face class formats. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 6, 1. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/ vol6no1/dell_0310.htm
Feintuch, H. (2010). Keeping their distance; new studies indicate students perform better online. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, 27, 3, retrieved from https://www.td.org/Publica-tions/Newsletters/Links
Fletcher, J., Nicholas, K. & Davis, N. (2011). Supporting adults to address their literacy needs using e-learning. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning 15,1, 17-29.
Friday, E., Friday-Stroud, S.S, Green, A.L. & Hill, A.Y. (2008). A multi-semester comparison of student performance between multiple traditional and online sections of two management courses. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 8, 1, 66-81.
Gunn, C., McSporran, M., Macleod, H. & French, S. (2003). Dominant or different? Gender issues in computer supported learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7, 14-30.
Jaggars, SH. & Baily, T. (2010). Effectiveness of Fully Online Courses for College Students: Response to a Department of Education Meta-Analysis. Community College Research Center, Teachers College, Columbia University.
Jahng, N., Krug, D. & Zhang, Z. (2007). Student achievement in the online distance education compared to face-to-face education. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning. Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/mater-ials/contrib/2007/Jahng_Krug_Zhang.htm
Kahiigi, E.K., Ekenberg, L., Hansson, H., Tusubira, F.F. & Danielson, M. (2008). Exploring the e-learning state of the art. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6 (2), 77-88. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org
Khampusaen, D. (2012). Successful e-Learning in Universities' EFL Classrooms: What do Teachers and Students Need? The Eighth International Conference on E-learning for Knowledge-Based Society. 23-24 February 2012, Thailand. pp.1-11.
McDonald, M., Dorn, B. & McDonald, G. (2004). A Statistical Analysis of Student Performance in Online Computer Science Courses, in Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, ACM Press, New York, NY, USA, pp. 71 – 74.
Mosalanejad, L., Shahsavari, S., Sobhanian, S. & Dastpak, M. (2012). The effect of virtual versus traditional learning in achieving competency-based skills. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 13, 2, 69-75.
Ni, A. Y. (2013). Comparing the Effectiveness of Classroom and Online Learning: Teaching Research Methods. Journal of Public Affairs Education, JPAE 19, 2, 199–215.
Nourian, Az., Nourian, Al., Ebnahmadi, A., Akbarzadeh, A. & Khoshnevisan, M., H., (2012). Comparison of E-learning and Traditional Classroom Instruction of Dental Public Health for Dental Students of Shahid Beheshti Dental School during 2010-2011. Journal Dental School, 30,3, 174-183.
Omidinia, S., Masrom, M. & Selamat, H. (2011). A Review of e-learning and ICT infrastructure in developing countries (Case study of Iran). American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3,1, 120-125.
Price, L. (2006). Gender differences and similarities in online courses: challenging stereotypical views of women. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 349–359.
Sangra, A., Vlachopoulos, D. & Cabrera, N. (2012). Building an Inclusive Definition of E-Learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 13, 2, 145-159.
Tai, D., Chen, J., Zhang, R., Tai, V. & Hu, Y. (2013). Gender differences in visual presentation e-learning. World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 11, 3, 274-279.
Yukselturk, E. & Bulut, S. (2009). Gender Differences in Self-Regulated Online Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 12,3, 12–22.
Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou. L. & Nunamaker, J. F. Jr. (2004) Can e-Learning Replace Classroom Learning? Communications of the ACM, 47, 5, 75-79. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 3,309 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 1,902 |
||