پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,129 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,669 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,606,045 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,292,642 |
تحول شناخت اجتماعی بر اساس نظریه ذهن در کودکان | ||
| شناخت اجتماعی | ||
| مقاله 3، دوره 1، شماره 2، دی 1391، صفحه 32-39 اصل مقاله (507.88 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| علی اصغر کاکو جویباری1؛ فرهاد شقاقی2؛ مجید برادران* 3 | ||
| 1دانشیار گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه پیام نور | ||
| 2استاد گروه روانشناسی دانشگاه پیام نور | ||
| 3و دانشجوی دکترای روانشناسی دانشگاه پیام نور | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه و هدف: نظریه ذهن یکی از مهمترین مباحث شناخت اجتماعی می باشد و از آنجا که پیش نیازی برای درک محیط اجتماعی و درگیری در رفتارهای اجتماعی رقابت آمیز است، طی دهههای اخیر در عرصه روانشناسی مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. بنابراین، هدف اساسی پژوهش حاضر بررسی تحول شناخت اجتماعی بر اساس نظریه ذهن و مقایسه نظریه ذهن در سه گروه از کودکان 3، 5 و 7 ساله می باشد. روش: برای این منظور 150 نفر از کودکان مذکور از شهرستان رشت به روش نمونه گیری خوشه ای مرحله ای انتخاب شدند و به آزمون 38 سوالی نظریه ذهن پاسخ دادند. داده ها با استفاده از روش تحلیل واریانس چند متغیره و آزمون تعقیبی در سطح معنی داری01/0≥ α مورد تجزیه و تحلیل قرار گرفتند. یافته ها: یافته ها نشان دادند که بین سه سطح نظریه ذهن در سه گروه مذکور تفاوت معناداری وجود دارد، به این صورت که آزمودنی های سنین بالاتر نسبت به آزمودنی های سنین پایین تر در همه سطوح نظریه ذهن، نمرات بالاتری را اخذ نمودند. نتایج: مبتنی بر یافته های پژوهش حاضر می توان اذعان نمود که کودکان با افزایش سن در سیر تحولی خود به سطوح متمایزی از نظریه ذهن دست می یابند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| شناخت اجتماعی؛ نظریه ذهن؛ تحول | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Development of Social Cognition in theory of mind in children | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Ali Asghar Kako Jouybari1؛ Farhad Shaghaghi2؛ Majid Baradaran3 | ||
| 1Associate Professor of Psychology, Payame Noor University | ||
| 2Professor of Psychology, Payame Noor University | ||
| 3And Ph.D. student of psychology at Payame Noor University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aims: Theory of mind is one of the most important topics in social cognition, and since, it is a prerequisite to understand the social environment and involvement in competitive social behavior, in recent decades has gained attention in the field of psychology. Therefore, the main purpose of the present study was the development of social cognition in children based on the theory of mind and comparison of theory of mind in three groups of 3, 5 and 7 years old children. Method: 150 children from Rasht city were selected by multiphase cluster sampling and completed the theory of mind scale (TMS-38). Data were analyzed in α≤0.01 significance level by multivariate analysis of variance and follow-up test. Results: The results showed that there were significant differences in levels of theory of mind between the three groups. In this case, the older subjects compared with younger subjects, obtained higher scores at all levels of theory of mind. Conclusions: According to the findings, children together with increase in age in their evolution, achieve distinct levels of theory of mind. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| social cognition, Theory of Mind, Development | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
- Abdollahzadeh Rafi, M.; Bahrami, H.; Mirzamani, S.M.; Salehi, M. & Hasanzadeh Avval, M. (2011). Development of Theory of Mind in Mentally Retarded Students and its Relation with the Number of the Siblings (Text in Persian). Rehabilitation, 11(4), P:19-27. - Aminyazdi, S.A. (2012). The Developmental, Individual-Difference, Relationship-Based model (Text in Persian). Foundations of Education, 2(1), P:109-126. - Ansarinezhad, S.; Movallali, G. & Adib Sereshki, N. (2012). The Effectiveness of Theory of Mind Training on the Promotion of Theory of Mind Levels in Educable Intellectual Disability(Text in Persian). Research in Clinical Psychology and Counseling, 1(2), P:105-120. - Bee, H. & Boyd, D. (2007). The developing child. (11th ed.). New York: Pearson. - Bjorklund, D.F. (2000). Children’s thinking developmenta function and individual differences (3th ed). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. L. - Carlson, S.M. & Moses, L.J. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and childrens theory of mind. Child development, 72(4), P:1032-1053. - Cebula, K.R. & Wishart, J.G. (2008) Social cognition in children with Down syndrome. International Review of Research in Mental Retardation, 35, P:43-86. - Farhadian, M.; Rohani, A.; Mariani, M.; Maarof, R. & Vijay, K. (2010). Parental demographics and preschool childrens theory of mind. Journal of Human Ecology, 29(2), P:121-128. - Flavell, J. H.(1999). Cognitive development: childrens knowledge about the mind. Annual Review of Psychology. 50, 21-45. - Ghamrani, A.; Alborzi, SH. & Khayer, M. (2006). Validity and Reliability of the Theory of Mind Test(TOM Test) for Use in Iran(Text in Persian). Journal of Psychology,10(2 (38)), P:181-199. - Haidari, T.; Shamive Isfahani, A. & Faramarzi, S. (2011). The Comparision Theory of Mind Dimension in Autism Children and Normal Children Isfahan City(Text in Persian). Knowledge & Research in Applied Psychology, 12(3 (45)), P:64-70. - Hassanzadeh, S.; Mohseni, N.; Afrouz, GH.A. & Hejazi, E. (2007). The Study of Cognitive Development in Deaf Children Based on Theory of Mind(Text in Persian). Research on Exceptional Children ,7(1 (23)), P:19-44. - Lane, J.D.; Wellman, H.M.; Olson, S.L.; LaBounty, J. & Kerr, D.C.R. (2010). Theory of Mind and Emotion Understanding Predict Moral Development in Early Childhood. British Journal of Development Psychology, 28, P: 871–889. - Mansuri, M.; Chalabianloo, GH.R.; Maleki Rad, A.A. & Mosaded, A.A. (2011). Comparison of Factors Affecting the Theory of Mind Development in Autistic and Normal Children(Text in Persian). Arak Medical University Journal(AMUJ), 13(53), P:115-125. - Mashhadi, A. & Mohseni, N. (2006). Comparitive Study on Theory of Mind and Number Conservation Abilities in Children with and without Mental Retardation(Text in Persian).Journal of Psychology, 10(2), P:134-155. - Mc Alister, A. & Peterson, C. (2006). Mental playment: siblings, executive functioning and theory of mind. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(4), P:733-751. - Muris, P.; Steerneman, P.; Meesters, C.; Merckelbach, H.; Horselenberg, R.; van den Hogen, T. & van Dongen, L., (1999). The TOM test: A new instrument for assessing theory ofmind in normal children and children with pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29(1), P: 67-80. - Razza, R.A. & Blair, C. (2009). Association among false-belief understanding, executive function, and social competence: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30 (3), 332-343. - Shahaeian, Sh.; Peterson, C.C.; Slaughter, V. & Wellman, H.M. (2011). Culture and the sequence of steps in theory of mind development. Developmental Psychology, 47(5), P:1239-1247. - Slaughter, V.; Dennis, M.J. & Pritchard, M. (2002). Theory of mind and peer acceptance in preschool children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20(4), P:545-564. - Sperling, R.A., Walls, H., & Hill, A. (2009). Early relationships among self-regulatory constructs: Theory of mind and preschool childrens problem solving. Journal of child study, 30(4), P:233-252. - Vinden, P.G. (2001). Parenting attitudes and children's understanding of mind: A comparison of Korean American and Anglo-American families. Cognitive Development,16, P:793-809. - Wellman, H.M.; Cross, D. & Watson J. (2001). Meta- analysis of theory of mind development the truth about false brief. Child Development, 72(3),P:655-684. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 4,873 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 8,387 |
||