پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,161 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,013 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,711,573 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,000,135 |
تأثیر بافت‌های مذهبی و غیرمذهبی بر عناصر نوایی جمله | ||
| فصلنامه علمی - پژوهشی زبان‌شناسی اجتماعی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 2، شماره 3 - شماره پیاپی 7، شهریور 1398، صفحه 75-85 اصل مقاله (600.33 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/il.2019.44940.1245 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مهناز طالبی دستنایی* ؛ ماندانا نوربخش؛ حمیده پشتوان | ||
| دانشگاه الزهرا | ||
| چکیده | ||
| در سال‌های اخیر پژوهش‌های فراوانی درمورد تأثیر سبک‌های مختلف گفتار بر تغییر عناصر نوایی انجام شده است. آواشناسی اجتماعی ترکیب تکنیک‌ها، عناصر و چهارچوب‌های نظری آواشناسی و جامعه‌شناسی را بررسی می‌کند. پژوهش حاضر، در چارچوب مطالعات آواشناسی اجتماعی، تأثیر کاربرد بافت بر میانگین فرکانس پایه، شدت و طول مدت‌زمان جفت‌کلمه‌ها و جفت‌پاراگراف‌های یکسان را در دو بافت مختلفِ مذهبی و غیرمذهبی با استفاده از نرم‌افزار PRAAT ویرایش 5.4.17 بررسی می‌کند. به این منظور از ده شرکت‌کنندۀ خانم با میانگین سنی 29 سال خواسته شد تا 8 پاراگراف (4 پاراگراف با بافت مذهبی و 4 پاراگراف با بافت غیرمذهبی) را با حالت سخنرانی بخوانند. هر جفت‌پاراگراف حاوی یکی از اسم‌های موردنظرِ پژوهش (فاطمه، محمد، عباس و حسین) است. هدفْ بررسیِ تفاوت میان میانگین فرکانس پایه (هرتز)، مدت‌زمان (هزارم ثانیه)، و شدت (دسی‌بل) در کلمه‌های یکسان اما در دو بافت مذهبی و غیرمذهبی است. نتایج پژوهش نشان می‌دهد که تمایز میان طول مدت‌زمان جفت‌کلمه‌های یکسان در دو بافت مذهبی و غیرمذهبی به‌لحاظ آماری معنی‌دار است، به این معنا که طول مدت‌زمان واژه‌های موردنظر در بافت مذهبی طولانی‌تر بوده است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| زبان‌شناسی اجتماعی؛ آواشناسی اجتماعی؛ عناصر نوایی؛ شدت؛ فرکانس پایه؛ دیرش | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Impact of Religious and Non-Religious Context on Prosodic Elements of the Sentence | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mahnaz Talebi Dastenaee؛ Mandana Nourbakhsh؛ Hamideh Poshtvan | ||
| Alzahra University | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| In recent years, numerous studies have been done on the impact of different speech styles on the changes of prosodic elements. Sociophonetics examines the combination of techniques, elements, and theoretical frameworks in phonology and sociology. The present study, within the framework of sociophonetics studies, examines the effect of context on the fundamental frequency, intensity and duration of identical word pairs and paragraphs in two different religious and nonreligious contexts using PRAAT software version 5.4.17. For this purpose, ten female participants with an average age of 29 years were asked to read 8 paragraphs (4 paragraphs with religious context and 4 paragraphs with non-religious context).Each paragraph contains one of the target research names (Fatemeh, Mohammad, Abbas, and Hossein). The purpose is to study the difference between the average fundamental frequency (Hz), duration (ms), and intensity (dB) in the same words but in both religious and non-religious contexts. The results show that the difference between the duration of identical word pairs in the two religious and non-religious contexts is statistically significant, meaning that the duration of the words in the religious context was longer. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| sociolinguistics, sociophonetics, prosodic elements, intensity, fundamental frequency, duration | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
اسلامی، محرم. (1384). واج‌شناسی: تحلیل نظام آهنگ زبان فارسی. تهران: سمت.
مدرسی، گلناز (1392). آواشناسی: بررسی علمی گفتار. تهران: سمت.
Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in society, 13(2), 145–204. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. Praat: doing phonetics by computer (version: 5.4.17). http://www.praat.org. (Retrieved from the web July16, 2016) Braga, D., & Marques, M. A. (2004). The pragmatics of prosodic features in the political debate. Paper presented at International Conference on Speech Prosody. Nara, Japan. 32-26 March. Braun, M. (2001). Speech mirrors norm-tones: Absolute pitch as a normal but precognitive trait. Acoustics Research Letters Online 2(3): 85-90. Cutler, A., Dahan, D., & Van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the comprehension of spoken language: A literature review. Language & speech, 40(2), 141-201. Diehl, J. J., Paul, R. (2009). The assessment and treatment of prosodic disorders and neurological theories of prosody. International journal of speech-language pathology, 11(4):287-292. Drager, K. (2010). Sociophonetic variation in speech perception. Language & Linguistics Compass, 4(7), 473–480. Foulkes, P., & Hay, J. (2015). The emergence of sociophonetic structure. In B. Whinney & W. O’Grady (Eds.). The handbook of language emergence (pp. 292–313). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Foulkes, P., Scobbie, J. M., & Watts, D. (2010). Sociophonetics. In W. J. Hardcastle, J. Laver & F. E. Gibbon (Eds.) The Handbook of Phonetic Sciences (2nd Ed) (pp.703-754). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Grassegger, H. (2010). Phonetik, Phonologie. Schulz-Kirchner Verlag GmbH. Guranski, K. & R. Podemski (2015). Emotional prosody expression in acoustic analysis in patients with right hemisphere ischemic stroke. Neurologia i neurochirurgia polska 49(2), 113-120. Hay, J., & Foulkes, P. (2016). The evolution of medial /t/ over real and remembered time. Language, 92(2), 298–330. Hertrich, I., & Ackermann, H. (2013). Neurophonetics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4(2), 191-200. Higuchi, N., Hirai, T., & Sagisaka, Y. (1997). Effect of speaking style on parameters of fundamental frequency contour. In Van Santen J.P.H., Olive J.P., Sproat R.W., & Hirschberg J. (Eds.) Progress in Speech Synthesis (pp.417-428). Springer, New York, NY. Hirschberg, J. B., & Rosenberg, A. (2005). Acoustic/prosodic and lexical correlates of charismatic speech. Interspeech’05. Proceeding of 9th European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology (pp. 513-516). Lisbon, Portugal. Keane, W. (1997). Religious language. Annual review of anthropology, 26(1), 47-71. Kiesling, S. F. (2009). Style as stance. In A. Jaffe (Ed.), Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 171–194). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Kuremastsu, M. (2008). An extraction of emotion in human speech using speech synthesize and classifiers for each emotion. WSEAS transaction on information science and applications 5(3): 246-251. Johnson, K., Strand, E. A., & D’Imperio, M. (1999). Auditory–visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 359–384. Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Labov, W. (1994). Principles of linguistic change. Volume 1: Internal factors. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change. Volume II: Social factors. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. Marotta, G., Massimiliano, B., & Paolo, B. (2008). Prosody and Boca’s aphasia: An acoustic analysis. Studi Linguistici e Filologici, 6, 79-98. McDonald, S. A., & Shillcock, R. C. (2003). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14(6), 648–652. Mozziconacci, S. (2001). Emotion and attitude conveyed in speech by means of prosody. Second Workshop on Attitude, Personality and Emotions in User-Adapted Interaction, Citeseer. Obin, N., Dellwo, V., Lacheret, A., & Rodet, X. (2010). Expectations for discourse genre identification: a prosodic study. In Eleventh Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Makuhari, Chiba, Japan, 26-30 September (pp. 3070-3073). O’Connell, D. C., & Kowal, S. (2002). Political eloquence. The social psychology of politics, Springer, Boston, 89-103. O’Grady, G. (2011). Culture and Gender of Voice Pitch: A Sociophonetic Comparison of the Japanese and the Americans by Ikuko Patricia Yuasa. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15(4), 548-551. Pattnaik, P., & Dash, S. (2012). A study on prosody analysis. International Journal of Computational Engineering Research, 2(5), 1594-1599. Pokorny, F. (2011). Extraction of prosodic features from speech signals. Unpublished bachelor project, Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics. Music and Performing Arts University of Graz, Austria. Retrieved from https://iem.kug. ac.at/en/projects/workspace/2010/extraction-of-prosodic-features-from-speech-signals.html. Prieto, P. (2012). Experimental methods and paradigms for prosodic analysis. In Cohn, A. C., Fougeron, C., Huffman, M. K., & Renwick, M. E. (Eds.) The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology (pp. 527-547). Oxford University Press. . Proença, J., Veiga, A., Candeias, S., & Perdigão, F. (2013). Acoustic, Phonetic and Prosodic Features of Parkinson's disease Speech. Paper presented at STIL-IX Brazilian symposium in information and human language technology, second Brazilian conference on intelligent systems (BRACIS 2013), Fortaleza/ Ceará, Brazil. Rosenberg, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2009). Charisma perception from text and speech. Speech Communication, 51(7), 640-655. Ross, J., & Lehiste, I. (1994). Lost prosodic oppositions: A study of contrastive duration in Estonian funeral laments. Language and Speech, 37(4), 407-424. Santos, J. F., Brosh, N., Falk, T. H., Zwaigenbaum, L., Bryson, S. E., Roberts, & Brian, J. A. (2013). Very early detection of autism spectrum disorders based on acoustic analysis of pre-verbal vocalizations of 18-month old toddlers. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (pp. 7567-7571). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319. Soskuthy, M., & Hay, J. (2017). Changing word usage predicts changing word durations in New Zealand English. Cognition, 166, 298–313. Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance. Communication and cognition (2nd ed.), Oxford: Blackwell. Strangert, E. (2005). Prosody in public speech: analyses of a news announcement and a Political interview. Paper presented at 9th European conference on speech communication and technology. Lisbon, Portugal. Lisbon, Portugal, 4-8 September. Swerts, M., Strangert, E., & Heldner, M. (1996). F0 declination in read-aloud and spontaneous speech. Spoken Language, 1996. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP-96, Philadelphia, PA, USA, October 3-6, (pp.1501-1504). Yuasa, I. P. (2008). Culture and gender of voice pitch: A sociophonetic comparison of the Japanese and Americans. Equinox Publishing. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 541 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 615 |
||