تعداد نشریات | 41 |
تعداد شمارهها | 1,121 |
تعداد مقالات | 9,571 |
تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,355,326 |
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,111,761 |
تحلیل عوامل محیطزیستی مؤثر در اتخاذ سیستمهای اطلاعاتی پایدار در مراکز خدمات درمانی با استفاده از رویکرد مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری | ||
فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
مقاله 8، دوره 8، شماره 1، آذر 1398، صفحه 117-132 اصل مقاله (620.9 K) | ||
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2019.6329 | ||
نویسندگان | ||
حسین صیادی تورانلو* 1؛ سلیم کریمی تکلو2؛ سجاد رحیمی آشجردی3 | ||
1دانشیار، تحقیق در عملیات، دانشگاه ولیعصر (عج) رفسنجان | ||
2استادیار، مدیریت تولید، دانشگاه ولیعصر (عج) رفسنجان | ||
3کارشناس ارشد، سیستمهای اطلاعاتی مدیریت، دانشگاه ولیعصر (عج) رفسنجان | ||
چکیده | ||
هدف این تحقیق شناسایی و مدلسازی عوامل مؤثر بر اتخاذ پایداری محیطزیستی در سیستمهای اطلاعاتی توسط مراکز خدمات درمانی است. جامعه آماری شامل دو گروه است. گروه اول شامل 12 خبره که از نظرات آنها جهت تعیین عوامل اصلی و تعیین روابط علت و معلولی آنها استفاده شد. جامعه دوم را، 250 نفر از کارکنان، پرستاران، سرپرستاران و سوپروایزرهای مرکز آموزشی و درمانی الزهرا (س) اصفهان تشکیل میدهند. بر اساس نتایج بررسی ادبیات تحقیق و مصاحبه با خبرگان دانشگاهی و حوزه فناوری اطلاعات مراکز درمانی، مجموعاً 24 عامل در 5 بعد الزامات قانونی، مسئولیتپذیری محیطزیستی، مشروعیت محیطزیستی، مصرف منابع و عدالت محیطزیستی شناسایی گردید. جهت بررسی روایی پرسشنامه تحقیق، از روایی محتوا و روایی سازه به کمک تحلیل عاملی تأییدی استفاده شد. همچنین پایایی کلی پرسشنامه بر اساس آلفای کرونباخ برابر با 888/0 است. پس از گردآوری دادههای موردنیاز، در ابتدا با استفاده از مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری، سطح ابعاد مدل در سه سطح تعیین شد. در بالاترین سطح مدل عامل عدالت محیطزیستی و در پایینترین سطح آن عوامل الزامات قانونی و مسئولیتپذیری محیطزیستی قرار گرفت. بر اساس مدل ساختاری تفسیری تحقیق، مدل تحلیل مسیر پژوهش طراحی و با استفاده از نرمافزار AMOS اجرا گردید. نتایج حاصل از تحلیل مسیر حاکی از این بود که از بین شش مسیر تعیینشده در مدل ساختاری تفسیری، تنها مسیر الزامات قانونی به مصرف منابع معنادار نیست. همچنین بیشترین اثر کل استاندارد را مصرف منابع بر مسئولیتپذیری محیطزیستی دارد. | ||
کلیدواژهها | ||
پایداری محیطزیستی؛ سیستم اطلاعاتی؛ مراکز خدمات درمانی؛ مدلسازی ساختاری تفسیری | ||
عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
Analysis of Effective Environmental Factors in the Adoption of Sustainable Information Systems in Healthcare Centers Using Structural Interpretive Modeling Approach | ||
نویسندگان [English] | ||
H. Sayyadi Tooranloo1؛ S. Karimi Taklo2؛ S. Rahimi Ashjerdi3 | ||
1Associate Professor, Operations Research, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan | ||
2Assistant Professor, Production Management, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan | ||
3Master Science, Management Information Systems, Vali-e-Asr University of Rafsanjan | ||
چکیده [English] | ||
This research aims to identify and model the factors affecting the adoption of environmental sustainability in information systems by healthcare centers. The statistical population of this study consists of two groups. The first group includes twelve experts whose ideas were used to determine the critical factors and their causal relationships. The second group includes 250 employees, nurses, head nurses, and supervisors of al-Zahra medical and educational center in Isfahan. According to the results obtained from the review of research literature and interview with academic experts and information technology areas of healthcare centers, a total of twenty-four factors were identified in five dimensions of legal requirements, environmental responsibility, environmental legitimacy, resource consumption, and environmental justice. The content validity and construct validity were used along with confirmatory factor analysis to examine the validity of the research questionnaire Also, the overall reliability of a questionnaire based on Cronbach's alpha was 0.888. After collecting the required data, the level of dimensions was first determined in three levels using interpretive structural modeling. The factor of environmental justice was placed at the highest level and the factors of legal requirements and environmental responsibility were placed at the lowest level. The analysis model of the research path was designed based on the research interpretive structural model and it was and implemented using AMOS software. The results from path analysis indicated that among the six paths identified in the interpretive structural model, it was only the path of a legal requirement to resource consumption path that is not meaningful. Moreover, resource consumption has the highest total standard effect on environmental responsibility. | ||
کلیدواژهها [English] | ||
Environmental Sustainability, Information System, Health Care Centers. Interpretive Structural Modeling | ||
مراجع | ||
Badri Ahmadi, H., Hashemi Petrudi, S. H. and Wang, X. (2016). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with an analytical hierarchy process and improved grey relational analysis: a case of the telecom industry. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 90(12), 2413–2427. Baggia, A., Brezavšček, A., Maletič, M., Šparl, P., Raharjo, H. and Žnidaršič, A. (2016). Awareness and Attitude Towards Green are in Slovenian Enterprises. Organizacija, 49(1), 15–27 Bai, C. and Sarkis, J. (2010). Integrating sustainability into supplier selection with a grey system and rough set methodologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 124(1), 252–264. Bai, C. and Sarkis, J. (2013). Green information technology strategic justification and evaluation. Information Systems Frontiers, 15(5), 831–847. Borgonovi, E. and Compagni, A. (2013). Sustaining Universal Health Coverage: The Interaction of Social, Political, and Economic Sustainability. Value in Health, 16(1), 34–38. Braa, J., Monteiro, E. and Sahay, S. (2004). Networks of Action: Sustainable Health Information Systems across Developing Countries. MIS Quarterly, 28(3), 337–362. Brosch, T., Sander, D. and Clément, F. (2016). Handbook of Value: Perspectives from Economics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology, and Sociology. Oxford University Press. Buchalcevova, A. (2016). Analysis of the management of business informatics framework from the green ICT viewpoint. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 15(1), 41. Buchalcevova, A. and Gala, L. (2013). Green ICT drivers and inhibitors perceived by the Czech SMEs. Journal of Systems Integration, 4(2), 43–49. Cagnin, C. H., Loveridge, D. and Butler, J. (2005). Information architecture to enable business sustainability. Citeseer, 1–21. Cai, S., Chen, X. and Bose, I. (2013). Exploring the role of IT for environmental sustainability in China: An empirical analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 491–500. Chen, A. J., Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M.-C. and Karahanna, E. (2011). An Institutional Perspective on the Adoption of Green IS & IT. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1), 5-27 Chofreh, A. G., Goni, F. A., Shaharoun, A. M., Ismail, S. and Klemeš, J. J. (2014). Sustainable enterprise resource planning: imperatives and research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 71, 139–147. Chowdhury, G. (2012). An agenda for green information retrieval research. Information Processing & Management, 48(6), 1067–1077. Chugh, R., Wibowo, S. and Grandhi, S. (2016). Environmentally sustainable Information and Communication Technology usage: awareness and practices of Indian Information and Communication Technology professionals. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131, 435–446. Esfahani, M. D., Nilashi, M., Rahman, A. A., Ghapanchi, A. H. and Zakaria, N. H. (2015). Psychological Factors Influencing the Managers’ Intention to Adopt Green IS:: A Review-Based Comprehensive Framework and Ranking the Factors. International Journal of Strategic Decision Sciences, 6(2), 28–56. Faisal, T., Rahman, Z. and Qureshi, M. N. (2011). Analysis of interaction among the barriers to total quality management implementation using interpretive structural modeling approach. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 18(4), 563–587. Frondel, M., Horbach, J. and Rennings, K. (2008). What triggers environmental management and innovation? Empirical evidence for Germany. Ecological Economics, 66(1), 153–160. Gholami, R., Molla, A., Goswami, S. and Brewster, C. (2017). Green information systems use in social enterprise: the case of a community-led eco-localization website in the West Midlands region of the UK. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(88), 1–17. Gholami, R., Sulaiman, A. B., Ramayah, T. and Molla, A. (2013). Senior managers’ perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey. Information & Management, 50(7), 431–438. Goh, C. Y. and Marimuthu, M. (2016). The Path towards Healthcare Sustainability: The Role of Organisational Commitment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 587–592. Harris, J. M. (2000). Basic principles of sustainable development. G-DAE Working Papers, Economic Theory, (pp. 1-24). Tufts University: The Global Development and Environment Institute (G-DAE). Ikeme, J. (2003). Equity, environmental justice, and sustainability: incomplete approaches to climate change politics. Global Environmental Change, 13(3), 195–206. Kimaro, H. and Nhampossa, J. (2007). The challenges of sustainability of health information systems in developing countries: comparative case studies of Mozambique and Tanzania. Journal of Health Informatics in Developing Countries, 1(1), 1-10 Li, D., Huang, M., Ren, S., Chen, X. and Ning, L. (2016). Environmental Legitimacy, Green Innovation, and Corporate Carbon Disclosure: Evidence from CDP China 100. Journal of Business Ethics, 1-16. Li, J., He, H., Liu, H. and Su, C. (2015). Consumer Responses to Corporate Environmental Actions in China: An Environmental Legitimacy Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 143(3), 589–602. Malhotra, A., Melville, N. P. and Watson, R. T. (2010). Information systems and environmental sustainability. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 429–30. Marnewick, C. (2017). Information system project's sustainability capability levels. International Journal of Project Management, 52(3), 92–102. Martens, M. L. and Carvalho, M. M. (2016). Key factors of sustainability in project management context: A survey exploring the project managers’ perspective. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1151–1166 Maruster, L., Faber, N. R. and Peters, K. (2008). Sustainable information systems: a knowledge perspective. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 10(3), 218–231. Mathiyazhagan, K., Govindan, K., NoorulHaq, A. and Geng, Y. (2013). An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing green supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 283–297. McGain, F. and Naylor, C. (2014). Environmental sustainability in hospitals – a systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy, 19(4), 245–252. Meacham, J., Toms, L., Green, K. W. and Bhadauria, V. S. (2013). Impact of information sharing and green information systems. Management Research Review, 36(5), 478–494. Mohai, P., Pellow, D. and Roberts, J. T. (2009). Environmental Justice. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34(1), 405–430. Molla, A. (2009). The extent of Green IT adoption and its driving and inhibiting factors: An exploratory study. Journal of Information Science and Technology, 6(4), 1–21. Molla, A. and Abareshi, A. (2012). Organizational green motivations for information technology: an empirical study. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 52(3), 92–102. Murugesan, S. and Gangadharan, G. R. (Eds). (2012). Harnessing green IT: principles and practices (1. ed). Chichester: Wiley. Nanath, K. and Pillai, R. (2012). A Sustainability Model of Green IT Initiatives. In ICIS 2012 Proceedings (pp. 1–22). Orlando: aisle. Nascimento, G., Araujo, C. A. S. and Alves, L. A. (2017). Corporate sustainability practices in accredited Brazilian hospitals: a degree-of-maturity assessment of the environmental dimension. Revista De Administração, 52(1), 26–35. Nazari, G. and Karim, H. (2012). Green IT adoption: The impact of IT on the environment: A case study on Green IT adoption and underlying factors influencing it. In 2012 Proceedings of 17th Conference on Electrical Power Distribution (pp. 1–7). Nedbal, D., Wetzlinger, W., Auinger, A. and Wagner, G. (2011). Sustainable IS Initialization Through Outsourcing: A Theory-Based Approach. In AMCIS. (pp. 1–10). Detroit, Michigan: semantic scholar. Nishant, R., Teo, T. S. H. and Goh, M. (2013). Sustainable Information Systems: Does It Matter? In PACIS Proceedings (pp. 1–16). Asia Pacific region: aisle. Nowduri, S. and Dba, S. A.-D. (2012). Management Information Systems and Its Support to Sustainable Small and Medium Enterprises. International Journal of Business and Management, 7(19), 125-131 Panamanian, V. and Linnanen, L. (2002). Management of corporate responsibility towards sustainability: triple bottom line approach. Oikos Ph.D. Summer Academy. Pasqualini Blass, A., da Costa, S. E. G., de Lima, E. P. and Borges, L. A. (2017). Measuring environmental performance in hospitals: A practical approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 279–289. Pasqualini Blass, A., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., Pinheiro de Lima, E. and Borges, L. A. (2016). Measuring environmental performance in hospitals: a framework and process. Measuring Business Excellence, 20(2), 52–64. Pisters, P., Bien, B., Dankner, S., Rubinstein, E. and Sheriff, F. (2017). Supporting hospital renewal through strategic environmental sustainability programs. Healthcare Management Forum, 30(2), 1–5. Russo, M. V. and Fouts, P. A. (1997). A Resource-Based Perspective on Corporate Environmental Performance and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559. Schmidt, N.-H., Erek, K., Kolbe, L. M. and Zarnekow, R. (2009). Sustainable Information Systems Management. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 1(5), 400–402. Seok, H., Nof, S. Y. and Filip, F. G. (2012). Sustainability decision support system based on collaborative control theory. Annual Reviews in Control, 36(1), 85–100. Simmonds, D. and Bhattacherjee, A. (2014). Green IT adoption and sustainable value creation. In AMCIS 2014 Proceedings (pp. 1–16). Savannah: aisle. Simmonds, D. M. (2015). Information Technology and Sustainability: An Empirical Study of the Value of the Building Automation System. The University of South Florida. Standing, C. and Jackson, P. (2007). An approach to sustainability for information systems. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 9(2), 167–176. Truex, D., Olsson, L., Lindblad-Gidlund, K., Sefyrin, J., Larsson, A., Nilsson, O., Anderson, K., et al. (2011). Position Statement: Sustainable Information and Information Systems (SIIS). In Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems. Managing the Transfer and Diffusion of IT (pp. 306–309). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. Yang, Z., Kankanhalli, A., Ng, B.-Y. and Lim, J. T. Y. (2013). Analyzing the enabling factors for the organizational decision to adopt healthcare information systems. Decision Support Systems, 55(3), 764–776. Yew, M. H. and Cooper, V. (2014). An Exploratory Study of the Intention to Use Information Systems to Manage Electricity Consumption: A Theme Analysis of Influencing Factors. ACIS (pp. 1–10). Presented at the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Auckland, New Zealand: ACIS. Zhu, Q. and Geng, Y. (2013). Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 40, 6–12. | ||
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 679 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 617 |