پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,129 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,669 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,611,585 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,295,845 |
الگوی امواج مغزی در باورهای فراطبیعی : مطالعه ای مبتنی بر EEG در گروه های شدید و خفیف | ||
| عصب روان شناسی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 5، شماره 19، بهمن 1398، صفحه 89-98 اصل مقاله (715.21 K) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/clpsy.2020.48062.1455 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| عبدالواحد نرماشیری* 1؛ احمد سهرابی2؛ جواد حاتمی3 | ||
| 1دانشجوی دکتری علوم شناختی، پژوهشکده علوم شناختی، دانشگاه شهیدبهشتی، تهران، ایران. | ||
| 2استادیار روانشناسی، دانشگاه کردستان، سنندج، ایران. | ||
| 3دانشیار روانشناسی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| مقدمه: هدف این تحقیق بررسی الگوی امواج مغزی در باورهای فراطبیعی با استفاده از EEG در گروه های شدید و خفیف بوده است . روش: شصت و چهار نفر( 18زن) با استفاده از روش نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند و با استفاده از مقیاس باورهای فراطبیعی بلکمور(1994) به‌عنوان گروههای دارای باورفراطبیعی شدید و خفیف تقسیم شدند. EEG ازشرکت کنندگان دو گروه در حالت استراحت ثبت شد. یافته ها: یافته ها نشان داد که تفاوت معنیداری بین گروههای باورهای فراطبیعی خفیف و باورهای فراطبیعی در موج دلتا (sig=0,01) و تتا (sig=0.03) وجود دارد و موج آلفا (sig=0.08) در مرز معناداری است..نتیجه گیری: بر اساس این یافته ها میتوان گفت که الگوی امواج مغزی در باورهای فراطبیعی متفاوت است. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| باورهای فراطبیعی- EEG- دلتا – تتا – آلفا – بتا – امواج مغزی | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Brainwave Pattern in Paranormal Beliefs: An EEG-based study in Severe and Mild groups | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Abdolvahed Narmashiri1؛ ahmad sohrabi2؛ Javad Hatami3 | ||
| 1Ph.D. Student in Cognitive Science,Institute for Cognitive SciencesStudies,Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran. | ||
| 2Assistant Professor of Psychology, University of Kordestan,.Sanandaj, Iran. | ||
| 3Associate Professor of Psychology, University of Tehran, Tehran .Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Aim The purpose of this study was to investigate the pattern of brain waves in paranormal beliefs using EEG in severe and mild groups.Methods: A convenient sample of 64 university students (18 females) were recruited for the experiment. they were divided into groups with severe and mildly paranormal beliefs using the Supernatural Beliefs Scale (Belkmore,1994). EEG of participants in both groups was recorded at rest. Results: The result of MANOVA showed a significant difference between mild paranormal and paranormal beliefs in Delta (sig = 0.01) and Theta (sig = 0.03) waves, and alpha wave (sig = 0.08) in the meaningful boundary.Conclusion: Based on these findings, it can be said that the pattern of brain waves in paranormal beliefs is different. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Paranormal Beliefs, EEG, Delta, Theta, Alpha, Beta, Brainwave | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Acharya, U. R., Hagiwara, Y., Deshpande, S. N., Suren, S., Koh, J. E. W., Oh, S. L., ... & Lim, C. M. (2018). Characterization of focal EEG signals: a review. Future Generation Computer Systems. Alipour, A. And Agah Harris, M. (2007). "Reliability and Validity of Edinburgh Handwriting Questionnaire in Iran". Journal of Psychological Sciences. 6 (22): 117-133.(Persian) Beeman, M., Chiarello, C., 1998. Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension: Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ. Blackmore, S., & Moore, R. (1994). Seeing things: Visual recognition and belief in the paranormal. European Journal of Parapsychology, 10, 91-103. Broks, P., 1984. Schizotypy and hemisphere function-11. Performance asymmetry on verbal divided visual-field tasks. Personality and Individual Differences 5, 649-656. Brugger, P. (2001). From haunted brain to haunted science. Hauntings and poltergeists: multidisciplinary perspectives. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 175-213. Brugger, P., & Mohr, C. (2008). The paranormal mind: How the study of anomalous experiences and beliefs may inform cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 44(10), 1291. Brugger, P., & Mohr, C. (2008). The paranormal mind: How the study of anomalous experiences and beliefs may inform cognitive neuroscience. Cortex, 44(10), 1291. Brugger, P., & Taylor, K. I. (2003). ESP: extrasensory perception or effect of subjective probability?. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(6-7), 221-246. Brugger, P., Gamma, A,, Muri, R., Schafer, M., Taylor, K., 1993a. Functional hemispheric asymmetry and belief in ESP: towards a ‘neuropsychology of belief‘. Perceptual and Motor Skills 77, 1299-1308. Brugger, P., Graves, R.E., 1997a. Right hemispatial inattention and magical ideation. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 247, 55-57. Brugger, P., Graves, R.E., 1997b. Testing vs. believing hypotheses: magical ideation in the judgements of contingencies. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 2, 251-272. Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D., & Niederberger, J. (1993). ‘Meaningful’patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP. Psychopathology, 26(5-6), 261-265. Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D., & Niederberger, J. (1993). ‘Meaningful’patterns in visual noise: Effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP. Psychopathology, 26(5-6), 261-265. Brugger, P., Regard, M., Landis, T., Cook, N., Krebs, D., Niederberger, J., 1993b. ‘Meaningful’ patterns in visual noise: effects of lateral stimulation and the observer’s belief in ESP. Psychopathology 26, 261-265. Crow, T.J., 1997. Schizophrenia as failure of hemispheric dominance for language. Trends in Neuroscience 20, 339-343. Dagnall, N., Denovan, A., Drinkwater, K., Parker, A., & Clough, P. J. (2017). Urban legends and paranormal beliefs: the role of reality testing and schizotypy. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 942. Dickey, C.C., McCarley, R.W., Voglmaier, M.M, Niznikiewicz, M.A., Seidman, L.J., Hirayasu, Y., Fischer, I., Teh, E.K., an Rhoads, R., Jakab, M., Kikinis, R., Jolesz, F.A., Shenton, M.E., 1999. Schizotypal personality disorder and MRI abnormalities of temporal lobe gray matter. Biological Psychiatry 45, 1393-1402. Flecka,l . Greenb,L.. Stevensond,L. Edward, M & At all. (2008).The transliminal brain at rest: Baseline EEG, unusual experiences, and access to unconscious mental activity.cortex,441353-1363. Gianotti, L. R., Mohr, C., Pizzagalli, D., Lehmann, D., & Brugger, P. (2001). Associative processing and paranormal belief. Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences, 55(6), 595-603. Irwin, H. J. (2009). The psychology of paranormal belief: A researcher's handbook. Univ of Hertfordshire Press. Irwin, H. J., Dagnall, N., & Drinkwater, K. (2012). Paranormal belief and biases in reasoning underlying the formation of delusions. Australian Journal of Parapsychology, 12(1), 7. Leonhard, D., Brugger, P., 1998. Creative, paranormal, and delusional thought: a consequence of right hemisphere semantic activation? Neuropsychiatry, Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology 11, 177-183. Lindeman, M., & Aarnio, K. (2007). Superstitious, magical, and paranormal beliefs: An integrative model. Journal of research in Personality, 41(4), 731-744. Lindeman, M., & Svedholm, A. M. (2012). What's in a term? Paranormal, superstitious, magical and supernatural beliefs by any other name would mean the same. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 241-255. Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition, 134, 63-76. Narmashiri, A., Sohrabi, A., & Hatami, J. (2017). Perceptual-Cognitive Biases in Relation to Paranormal Beliefs: A Comparative Study in Brain Lateralization Groups. Neuropsychology, 2 (7), 79-92. (Persian). Narmashiri, A., Sohrabi, A., & Hatami, J. (2018). Perceptual Processing in Paranormal Beliefs: A Study of Reaction Time and Bias. social cognition, 6 (2), 122-134. (Persian) Pennycook, G., Cheyne, J. A., Seli, P., Koehler, D. J., & Fugelsang, J. A. (2012). Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition, 123(3), 335-346. Pizzagalli, D., Lehmann, D., & Brugger, P. (2001). Lateralized direct and indirect semantic priming effects in subjects with paranormal experiences and beliefs. Psychopathology, 34(2), 75-80. Prike, T., Arnold, M. M., & Williamson, P. (2017). Psychics, aliens, or experience? Using the Anomalistic Belief Scale to examine the relationship between type of belief and probabilistic reasoning. Consciousness and cognition, 53, 151-164. Riekki, T., Lindeman, M., Aleneff, M., Halme, A., & Nuortimo, A. (2013). Paranormal and religious believers are more prone to illusory face perception than skeptics and non‐believers. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 150-155. Van Elk, M. (2013). Paranormal believers are more prone to illusory agency detection than skeptics. Consciousness and cognition, 22(3), 1041-1046. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 986 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 479 |
||