اخبار و اعلانات

 آمار

تعداد نشریات41
تعداد شماره‌ها1,138
تعداد مقالات9,765
تعداد مشاهده مقاله17,904,161
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله12,514,739
حسنی, زهره, احمدی, بهشت, ظریفی, فریبرز. (1398). اثر ادراک منزلت اجتماعی بر اشتیاق شغلی معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی. فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 6(4), 93-106. doi: 10.30473/fmss.2020.47695.1983
زهره حسنی; بهشت احمدی; فریبرز ظریفی. "اثر ادراک منزلت اجتماعی بر اشتیاق شغلی معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی". فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 6, 4, 1398, 93-106. doi: 10.30473/fmss.2020.47695.1983
حسنی, زهره, احمدی, بهشت, ظریفی, فریبرز. (1398). 'اثر ادراک منزلت اجتماعی بر اشتیاق شغلی معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی', فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 6(4), pp. 93-106. doi: 10.30473/fmss.2020.47695.1983
حسنی, زهره, احمدی, بهشت, ظریفی, فریبرز. اثر ادراک منزلت اجتماعی بر اشتیاق شغلی معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی. فصلنامه علمی زیست فناوری گیاهان زراعی, 1398; 6(4): 93-106. doi: 10.30473/fmss.2020.47695.1983

اثر ادراک منزلت اجتماعی بر اشتیاق شغلی معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی

مطالعات مدیریت رفتار سازمانی در ورزش
مقاله 8، دوره 6، شماره 4 - شماره پیاپی 24، دی 1398، صفحه 93-106    اصل مقاله (1.79 M)
نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی
شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/fmss.2020.47695.1983
نویسندگان
زهره حسنی1؛ بهشت احمدی2؛ فریبرز ظریفی* 3
1استادیار مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه رازی
2دکتری مدیریت ورزشی
3دانشجوی دکتری مدیریت ورزشی دانشگاه رازی
چکیده
هدف از انجام این پژوهش، بررسی اثر منزلت اجتماعی بر شاخص‌های اشتیاق شغلی در بین معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی شهر کرمانشاه بود. جامعه آماری معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی شهر کرمانشاه بود. روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی ساده و حجم نمونه 218 نفر بود.
شرکت‌کنندگان پرسش‌نامه‌ منزلت اجتماعی و مقیاس اشتیاق شغلی معلّمان را تکمیل نمودند. برای تحلیل اطلاعات از آزمون تی تک نمونه‌ای و مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری (SEM) استفاده گردید. روایی و پایایی مدل اندازه‌گیری تأیید شد. نتایج آزمون تی تک‌نمونه‌ای نشان داد منزلت اجتماعی (60/0 ± 71/2) و اشتیاق شغلی (49/0 ± 36/2) در جامعه مورد مطالعه پایین‌تر از حدّ متوسط بود. همچنین بین معلّمان زن و مرد تفاوت معناداری دیده نشد. مدلسازی معادلات ساختاری نشان داد که منزلت اجتماعی اثرات مثبتی بر اشتیاق شغلی دارد (71/0β=) دارد، به علاوه منزلت اجتماعی 50/0 از واریانس اشتیاق شغلی معلّمان تربیت‌بدنی را تبیین نمود. نتایج حاصل از این مطالعه اهمیّت توجّه به منزلت معلّمان را نشان و آن را به منزلۀ عاملی برای ارتقای اشتیاق شغلی در مدرسه مطرح می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
جذب کار شدن؛ شوق کار شدن؛ وقف کار شدن؛ احترام؛ ارزش
عنوان مقاله [English]
The effect of perception social Status on work engagement in teachers of physical education
نویسندگان [English]
Zohre Hasani1؛ Behesht Ahmadi2؛ Fariborz Zarifi3
1Assistant Professor of Razi university
2Phd in Sport Management
3Phd student in Sport Management, Razi university
چکیده [English]
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of perception social Status on work engagement in teachers of physical education in Kermanshah city. The statistical population consist all teachars of physical education in Kermanshah city. Simple random sampling method and sample size were 218 people. Participants completed social Status questionnaire and Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. The data analysis was performed using one-sample t-test and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). Validity and reliability of the Measurement models were confirmed.The results of single-sample t-test showed that the level of perception social prestige (2.71 ± 0.60) and work engagement (2.36 ± 0.49) in the studied society were lower than average. The Structural equation modeling revealed that social Status effected on work engagement (β=0.71). In addition, perception social Status also explains 0.50 work engagement variances. The results of this study show the importance of paying attention to the social Status of teachers and make it as a factor in promoting work engagement at school.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
: Vigor, Dedication, Absorption, Respect.Value
مراجع
  1. Abdimoghadam, S., Ramzaninejad, R. Pursoltani, H, 'A Comparison of Educational Position of Physical Education Course from the Viewpoints of High School Principals, Teachers, Parents and Students'. Journal of Sport Physiology & Management Investigations; 2018. 10(1), 129-143 (Persian).
  2. Aflakifard, H, Study of Social Status of Teacher in Islamic Education System from Idea to Reality, Master's Thesis, Shiraz University, Faculty of Educational Sciences ;2009 (Persian).
  3. Aguilar Wafaie, M, Teacher Job Stress: The prevalence, sources and consequences of occupational stress among elementary and secondary school teachers. Quarterly Journal of Psychological Research; 2000. 6(1,2).63-91 (Persian).
  4. Alizadeh, E., Rezaei, A.M , A study on the Social Status of High school and Primary School Teachers and it’s Changes in Past Three Decades .Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations; 2009.  29, 7-26 (Persian).
  5. Aminbeidokhti, A., Jafari, S., Moradi moghadam, M, 'Relationship between Organizational Socialization and Teachers’ Work Engagement with Mediating Role of Organizational Identity', Social Capital Management2016. 3(4), 563-582 (Persian).
  1. Bahrami, M. Rahimzadeh-Feyzabad, T. The relationship between Social and Professional Status and Occupational Components from the Nurses’ Perspective in Vali-e Asr Educational Hospital of Birjand. Journal of Student Research Committee Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences ;2017.22(40).50-59(Persian).
  1. Bakker, A. B. Albrecht, S. L. & Leiter, M. P , Work engagement: Further reflections on the state of play. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology;2011, 20(1), 74-88.
  2. Bakker, A. B., & Bal, M. P,Weekly work engagement and performance: A study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology;2010, 83(1), 189-206.
  3. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E, Towards a model of work Engagement. Career Development Internatio, 13 (3),2008. 209-223.
  4. Bakker, A. B., Schaufeli, W. B., Leiter, M. P. & Taris, T. W , Work engagement: An emerging concept in occupational health psychology. Work & Stress; 2008.22(3), 187-200.
  5. Dančíková, V. Antala, B. School Managers’ Opinions about Physical and Sport Education of Boys and Girls, 6th Fiep European Congress, Croatia;2011.116-122.
  6. Feize, D. Sharafi, V. Shool, H,  Relationship Between Socil Status and Subtlety: Investigating the Role of Organizational Indifference. Journal of Human Resource Management Research;2009. 6(3),107-128 (Persian).
  1. Firozjaeyan . A. gerami . F . Investigating the relationship between cultural capital and social status of teachers(Case Study: High School Teachers in Khalkhal). Iranian Journal of Social Sciences Studies. 2014.11(41) 105-120. (Persian).
  2. Fujishiro K., Xu J., Gong F, What does “occupation” represent as an indicator of socioeconomic status? Exploring occupational prestige and health. Social Science & Medicine;2010. 71: 2100-2107.
  3. Fwu, B. J. & Wang, H. H, The social status of teachers in Taiwan. Comparative Education;2002, 38(2), 211-224.
  1. Ghanenia, M., Forouhar, M., Jalili, S, 'The Effect of Managers Psychological Capital Components Training on Increasing the Employees Engagement', Positive Psychology;2015. 1(3), 59-72 (Persian).
  2. Han, J., Yin, H., & Wang, W, The effect of tertiary teachers’ goal orientationsfor teaching on their commitment: The mediating role of teacher engagement. Educational Psychology;2015. 36(3), 526-547.
  3. Hair, J.F. Black, W.C. Babin, B.J. Anderson, R.E,Multivariate Data Analysis, seventh ed. Prentice Hall,2010. 640-655.
  4. Henseler, J., Ringle, C.M., Sinkovics, R.R, The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing, Advances in International Marketing ;2009.20, 277-320.
  5. Honari,H. Designing a model for the physical education teachers’ professional characteristics and competencies. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studie;2018.5(3).55-68(Persian).
  6. Jahangiri. A. Elmi. M  . Social factors related to improving the social status of high school teachers in Meshkinshahr from teachers’ own points of view. Journal Sociology Studies;2015. 8(28)7-23(Persian).
  7. Kaldi,A. Asgari, G, The Investigation of job satisfaction of elementary school teachers in Tehran city. Journal Psychology & Educational ;2003.33(1), 103-120 (Persian).
  8. Kang, D. Stewart, J. Kim, H, The effects of perceived external prestige, ethical organizational climate, and leader-member exchange (LMX) quality on employees' commitments and their subsequent attitudes, Personnel Review; 2011.40(6): 761-784.
  9. Kazemipour, S, The People's Attitude on the Status of Jobs in Iran and its Relationship with Socio-Economic Characteristics of Individuals in Tehran. 2004,Labor and Social Security Institute (Persian).
  10. Kearney, S, Reconceptualizing beginning teacher induction as organizational socialization: A situated learning model. Cogent Education; 2015,2(1), 1-11.
  11. Kennedy, E. Daim, T. U, A Strategy to Assist Management in Workforce Engagement and Employee Retention in the High Tech Engineering Environment. Journal of Evaluation and Program Planning;2010. 33(4), 468-476.
  12. Keshavarz, L. Jalalifarahani, M. Ansari, S, 'Comparison of the Attitude of Students and Teachers of other Courses to the Teachers of Physical Education at the High School in Bandarabbas'. Journal Management System;2013. 2(5), 75-84 (Persian).
  13. Khosravizadeh,E. Kamankesh, A. Moghadasi, H, Zohrehvandian,K.The relationship between Organizational Justice and Job Eengagement with Organizational Performance of coaches (case study: Arak Sports boards). Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies.2018.6(21).51-59 (Persian).
  14. Kini.M.S. Sabanimoghadem,K. Nazari, l.  Social status of physical education teachers. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science; 2019. 7(3),13-21.
  15. Klassen RM, Aldhafri S, Mansfield CF, Purwanto E, Siu AFY, Wong MW, McConney AW. Teachers’ engagement at work: An international validation study. The Journal of Experimental Education;2012. 80(4),317-337.
  16. Kulophas, D., Ruengtrakul, A. & Wongwanich, S, The Relationships among authentic leadership, teachers’ work engagement, academic optimism and school size as moderator: A conceptual model. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences;2014. 191, 2554-2558.
  17. Mahdian S, Hakimzadeh,. R, Safaei, Movahed, S, Salehi. K.Teachers’ Perception of their Social Status: A Phenomenological Study Based on their Lived Experiences. Quarterly Journal Family and Research; 2018. 15 (1):19-38(Persian).
  18. Messah, H. OreiziSamani, S. H. R. & Kalantari, M,Teacher's Passion: Self-Regulating Mediation: The Relationship between School Attitude and Teacher's Attitudes. Quarterly Journal of Education;2016;33(3), 131-147 (Persian).
  19. McCron,Tami,Morris,Marian,Walker,Matthew, Pupil Choices at key stage3, Literature  Review , National Foundation for Education Research(NFER) ;2005. 50-56.
  20. Monteiro, R. A. The teaching profession present and future; 2015. New York: Springer.
  21. Moyedfar, S. Zhani, G, Study of teachers' job dissatisfaction and social factors affecting it (case study of Teachers in Neyshabur). Quarterly Journal of Sociology of Iran;2005.6(1), 135-150 (Persian).
  22. Mutluer,S., Yüksel, S. The Social Status of the Teaching Profession: A Phenomenological Study;2019 Journal of Teacher Education and Educator.8(2). 183-203.
  23. Naami.A.Z. Shenavar. F. The Role of Work Engagement, Job Control, Innovative Behavior, and Transformational Leadership in Prediction of Job Crafting. Journal Public Management Researches  (2015).8(27).145-165 (Persian).
  24. National Association for Sport and Physical Education Physical Activity Used as Punishment and/or Behavior Management; 2009, available on the www.aahperd.org/naspe.
  25. Navid adham, M., & Shafiezadeh, H, A Study of Social and Cultural Factors Affecting the Social Status of  Teachers. . Quarterly Journal Strategic; 2014, 23(73),175-194  (Persian).
  26. Nigah, N., Davis, A. J. & Hurrell, S. A, The impact of buddying on psychological capital and work engagement: An empirical study of socialization in the professional services sector. Journal of Thunderbird International Business Review; 2012.54(6), 891-905.
  27. Qaderzadeh.O., Faraji.S. An Analysis of Experience of Dual-Job Teachers; A Qualitative Study of Reasons and Consequences. Journal of Culture Strategy; 2014. 7(26).119-146 (Persian).
  28. Schaufeli,W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. , The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire. Educational and Psychological Measurement;2006. 66, 701–716.
  29. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G, A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling (3rd Edition ed.). New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, LLC;2010
  30. Seligman, M. E. , Fundamental assumptions. Psychologist;2003. 16(3): 126-137.
  31. Symeonidis, V. The status of teachers and the teaching profession: A study of education unions’ perspectives. Brussels; 2015. Education International Research Institute.
  32. Tavasouli.G.A., khodayare. S., yousefvand .L.Promotion the Social Status of Teachers and Effective Factors (case of study: the city of Darehshahr) Journal Social Research; 2015. 7(27) 19-42(Persian).
  33. Tayebinia,M.The Survey of sociological factors related to the social Prestige of women teachers; Tow Quartery Contemporary Sociological Research;2014.3(4):141-168 (Persian).
  1. Ram, P., & Prabhakar, G. V. , The role of employee engagement in work-related outcomes. Interdisciplinary.Journal of Research in Business;2009. 1(3): 47-61.
آمار
تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 821
تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 933


سامانه مدیریت نشریات علمی. قدرت گرفته از سیناوب