پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,170 |
| تعداد مقالات | 10,081 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 18,883,812 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 13,101,270 |
Environmental Requirements of Intergenerational Justice for Sustainable Development | ||
| فصلنامه علمی آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار | ||
| مقاله 6، دوره 9، شماره 4، 1400، صفحه 73-84 اصل مقاله (1.26 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ee.2021.56039.2284 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| Bahram Sarmast* 1؛ Ahad Rezayan Ghayehbashi* 2؛ Amin Moeinian3؛ Afsaneh Abbasi4 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Political Science Department, University Of Payam- Noor, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Research Fellow in National Research Institute for Science Policy. Futures Studies Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3MSc. of Public Finance, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4MSc. of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده | ||
| Despite nearly two decades from Agenda 21 adoption, emphasizing the design and implementation of sustainable development indicators, there is no consensus on Sustainability indicators for designing and evaluating it to be acceptable to all elites and experts around the world. Recently, the issue of Intergenerational justice in sustainable development has been of great importance. This paper addresses the identification of environmental indicators related to intergenerational justice for sustainable development. The method of this research is qualitative and with respect to the target, it is an exploratory study. The participants in this study were 18 academic and executive experts selected by purposeful and non-probable methods. Interviews were analyzed through the thematic analysis method, and later the MAXQDA software was used to display the grid. The result of this research was the identification of 43 sub-themes in the form of nine themes. The themes were natural resources, social capital, laws and regulations, spatial planning, renewable energy, environmental vulnerability, environmental health and sustainability, environmental performance, and ecological footprint. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| Environment؛ Intergenerational equity؛ Sustainable؛ futures studies | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| Environmental Requirements of Intergenerational Justice for Sustainable Development | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Bahram Sarmast1؛ Ahad Rezayan Ghayehbashi2؛ Amin Moeinian3؛ Afsaneh Abbasi4 | ||
| 1Assistant Professor, Political Science Department, University Of Payam- Noor, Tehran, Iran | ||
| 2Research Fellow in National Research Institute for Science Policy. Futures Studies Postdoctoral Researcher, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 3MSc. of Public Finance, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| 4MSc. of Public Administration, University of Tehran, Iran | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Despite nearly two decades from Agenda 21 adoption, emphasizing the design and implementation of sustainable development indicators, there is no consensus on Sustainability indicators for designing and evaluating it to be acceptable to all elites and experts around the world. Recently, the issue of Intergenerational justice in sustainable development has been of great importance. This paper addresses the identification of environmental indicators related to intergenerational justice for sustainable development. The method of this research is qualitative and with respect to the target, it is an exploratory study. The participants in this study were 18 academic and executive experts selected by purposeful and non-probable methods. Interviews were analyzed through the thematic analysis method, and later the MAXQDA software was used to display the grid. The result of this research was the identification of 43 sub-themes in the form of nine themes. The themes were natural resources, social capital, laws and regulations, spatial planning, renewable energy, environmental vulnerability, environmental health and sustainability, environmental performance, and ecological footprint. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Environment, Intergenerational equity, Sustainable, futures studies | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Agyeman, J., & Evans, B. (2004). "Just Sustainability": The Emerging Discourse of Environmental Justice in Britain? The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 155–164. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3451592
Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Elbakidze, M., Stryamets, N., & Johansson, K.-E. (2011). Sustainable development and Sustainability: Landscape approach as a practical interpretation of principles and implementation concepts. Journal of Landscape Ecology, 4(3), 5–30.
Ayumi Onuma. (1999). Sustainable consumption, sustainable development, and green net national product, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 2: 187-197.
Braun, v & Clarke, v (2006), Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qualitative Research in Psychology Journal, 2(1): 123-140
Caiado, R. G. G., de Freitas Dias, R., Mattos, L. V., Quelhas, O. L. G., & Leal Filho, W. (2017). Towards sustainable development through the perspective of eco-efficiency - A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 890–904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.166
Dovers, S. R., & Handmer, J. W. (1992). Uncertainty, Sustainability and change. Global Environmental Change, 2(4), 262–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-3780(92)90044-8
Emmanuel Kumi, Albert A. Arhin, & Thomas Yeboah. (2014). Can post-2015 sustainable development goals survive neoliberalism? A critical examination of the sustainable development neoliberalism nexus in developing countries, Environ Dev Sustain, 16:539–554.
Eleni Sinakou, Jelle Boeve-de Pauw, & Peter Van Petegem. (2017). Exploring the concept of sustainable development within education for sustainable development: implications for ESD research and practice, Environ Dev Sustain
Golub, A., Mahoney, M., & Harlow, J. (2013). Sustainability and intergenerational equity: Do past injustices matter? Sustainability Science, 8(2), 269–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0201-0
Gosseries, A. (2008). Theories of Intergenerational Justice: a Synopsis. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-39-2008
Gray, P., Williamson, J. & Karp, D. (2007), The Research imagination: an Introduction to qualitative and quantitative methods. Cambridge University Press.
Helen Kopnina. (2013). Evaluating education for sustainable development (ESD):using Ecocentric and Anthropocentric Attitudes toward the Sustainable Development (EAATSD) scale. Environ Dev Sustain, 15:607–623
Hesse-Biber., Nagy, S., & Levy, P. (2004), Approaches to Qualitative Research. New York: Oxford University Press
Howarth, R. B. (1997). Sustainability as Opportunity. Land Economics, 73(4), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1307/3147246
Lan Moffatt. (1993). Sustainable development: conceptual issues, an operational model an its implications for Australia, Landscape and Urban Planning, 23 (1993) 107- 118.
Llavador, H., Roemer, J. E., & Silvestre, J. (2010). Intergenerational justice when future worlds are uncertain. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 46(5), 728–761.
Mel, M. (2003). A framework for intergenerational planning. Foresight, 5(6), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680310698801
Muller, J. (2014). The pathos of specialised knowledge. Educational Research in South Africa: Practices and Perspectives, 1–10.
Michael J. Dockry, Katherine Hall. William Van Lopik, & Christopher M. Caldwell. (2016). Sustainable development education, practice, and research:an indigenous model of sustainable development at the College of Menominee Nation, Keshena, WI, USA. Sustain Sci,11:127–138.
Nguyen Cao Don, Hiroyuki Araki, Nguyen Thi Minh Hang, Hiroyuki Yamanishi, & Kenichi Koga. (2008). Modeling groundwater flow and its associated environmental problem in a lowland coastal plain: a first step towards a sustainable development plan. Environ Dev Sustain, 10:219–231.
Olawumi, T. O., & Chan, D. W. M. (2018). A scientometric review of global research on Sustainability and sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.02.162
Rashidi, K., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2015). Measuring eco-efficiency based on green indicators and potentials in energy saving and undesirable output abatement. Energy Economics, 50, 18–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.018
Rawls, John (1999) A Theory of Justice. Revised Edition. Cambridge, Harvard University Press
Sartori, S., Latrônico, F., & Campos, L. M. S. (2014). Sustainability and sustainable development: a taxonomy in the field of literature. Ambiente Sociedade, 17, 1–22.
Simcock, N. (2016). Procedural justice and the implementation of community wind energy projects: A case study from South Yorkshire, UK. Land Use Policy, 59, 467–477. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.08.034
Seidman, I. (2006), Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences. 3rd ed. by Teachers College Press.
Sustainable development goals. (n.d.). Retrieved from United Nations website: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals
Verma, A. K. (2019). Sustainable development and environmental ethics. International Journal on Environmental Sciences, 10(1), 1-5.
Wall, G. (2018). Beyond sustainable development. Tourism Recreation Research, 43(3), 390-399.
Yuan, B., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Flexible environmental policy, technological innovation and sustainable development of China’s industry: The moderating effect of environment regulatory enforcement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243, 118543. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 736 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 664 |
||