References
[1] Patel, C. (2013). Use of multimedia technology in teaching and learning communication
skill: An analysis. IJOART, 2, 116-123.
[2] Becker. H. C. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry
Cuban right? Education Policy Analysis Archive, 8, 1-31.
[3] Raschio. A. R. (1990). The role of cognitive style in improving computer-assisted language
learning. Hispania, 73, 535-541.
[4] Moundridou, M., & Virvou, M. (2003). Analysis and design of a Web-based authoring tool
generating Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Computers & Education, 40, 157-181.
[5] Curilema, S. G., Barbosab, A. R., & de Azevedo F. M. (2007). Intelligent tutoring systems:
Formalization as automata and interface design using neural networks. Computers &
Education, 49, 545-561.
[6] Moody, R., & Bobic, M. (2011). Teaching the Net Generation without leaving
the rest of us behind: How technology in the classroom influences student
composition. Politics & Policy, 39(2), 169-194.
[7] West, D. M. (2011). Using technology to personalize learning and assess students in realtime.
Washington DC: Governance Studies.
[8] Ismail, H. M., Harouse, S., & Belkhouche, B. (2017). Review of personalized language
learning systems. Paper presented in 2016 12th International Conference on Innovations in
Information Technology (IIT). Al Ain, United Arab Emirates.
[9] Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). The psychology of the language learner revisited. London:
Routledge.
[10] U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology, Reimagining the Role of
Technology in Education: 2017 National Education Technology Plan Update. Washington,
D.C.
[11] Garrick, B., Pendergast, D., & Geelan, D. (2017). Theorizing personalized education.
Singapore: Springer
[12] Gómez, S., Zervas, S., Sampson, D. G., & Fabregat, R. (2014). Context-aware adaptive and
personalized mobile learning delivery supported by UoLmP, Journal of King Saud
University - Computer and Information Sciences, 26(1), 47-61.
[13] Green, H., Facer, K., Rudd, T., Dillon, P., & Humphreys, P. (2005). Personalization and
digital technologies. UK: Futurelab.
[14] Jung, I. S. (2001). Building a theoretical framework of Web-based instruction in the
Mehrak Rahimi and Ghazal Beyzavi, Fatemeh Saffari: Effects of a Personalized Reading … 21
context of distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(5), 525-534.
[15] Wolf, M. (2010). Innovate to educate: System [re]design for personalized learning. A
report from the 2010 symposium. Washington, DC: Software & Information Industry
Association.
[16] Zajac, M. (2009). Using learning styles to personalize online learning. Campus-Wide
Information Systems, 26(3), 256-265.
[17] Papanikolaou, K.A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., & Magoulas, G. D. (2003).
Personalizing the interaction in a Web-based educational hypermedia system: the case of
INSPIRE. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction., 13(3), 213-267.
[18] Martinez, M. (2002). Designing learning objects to personalize learning. In Wiley, D. (Ed),
The instructional use of leaning objects (pp. 151-171). Bloomington, Indiana: AIT/AECT
[19] Hwang, G. J., Kuo, F. R., Yin, P. Y., & Chuang, K. H. (2010). A heuristic algorithm for
planning personalized learning paths for context-aware ubiquitous learning. Computers &
Education, 54(2), 404-415.
[20] Lin, C. F., Yeh, Y. C., Hung, Y. H., & Chang, R. I. (2013). Data mining for providing a
personalized learning path in creativity: An application of decision trees. Computers &
Education, 68, 199-210.
[21] Alamri, A., Watson, S., & Watson, W. (2021). Learning technology models that support
personalization within blended learning environments in higher education. TechTrends, 65,
62-78.
[22] Ellis, R. (2008). The study of second language acquisition (2nd ed). Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
[23] Zapalska, A., & Brozik, D. (2006). Learning styles and online education. Campus-Wide
Information Systems, 23(5), 325-335.
[24] Bachari, E., Abelwahed, E. H., & El Adnani, M. (2011). E-learning personalization based
on dynamic learners’ preference. International Journal of Computer Science & Information
Technology, 3(3), 200-216.
[25] Yang, T.-C., Hwang, G.-J., & Yang, S. J.-H. (2012). Development of an adaptive learning
system with multiple perspectives based on students' learning styles and cognitive styles.
Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 185-200.
[26] Horváth, I. (2021). An analysis of personalized learning opportunities in 3D VR. Frontiers
in Computer Science, 3, Article 673826.
[27] Martin, A. J., Dominic, A. M., & F. S. Francis (2021). Learners classification for
personalized learning experience in e-learning systems. International Journal of Advanced
Computer Science and Applications, 12(4), 690-697.
[28] Skehan, P. (1991) Individual differences in second language learning. Studies in Second
Language Acquisition, 13, 275-98.
[29] Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning
system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers &
Education, 51, 624-645.
[30] Petersen, S. A., & Markiewicz, J. K. (2009). Personalized and contextualized language
learning: Choose when, where and what. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced
Learning, 4(1), 33-60
[31] Jung, J. Y., & Graf, S. (2008). An approach for personalized web-based vocabulary
learning through word association games. Paper presented in the International Symposium
on Applications and the Internet.
[32] Su, P., Yu, T., Su, Y., & Lee, L. (2013). A cloud-based personalized recursive dialogue
game system for Computer-Assisted Language Learning. In Proceedings of SLaTE 2013
(pp. 37-41). Grenoble, France.
[33] Xu, Z., Wijekumar, K., Ramirez, G., Hu, X., & Irey, R. (2019). The effectiveness of
22 Iranian Distance Education Journal, Vol. 3, No. 1, (New Series) Winter-Spring 2021
intelligent tutoring systems on K-12 students’ reading comprehension: A meta-analysis.
British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3119-3137.
[34] Rahimi, M. (Ed). 2015. Handbook of research on individual differences in CALL. US: IGI
Global.
[35] A2 Key handbook for exams from 2020. Retrieved January 2021 from 504505-a2-keyhandbook-2020.pdf.
2020
[36] Barbe, W. B., Swassing, R. H., & Milone. M. N. (1979). Teaching through modality
strengths: concepts practices. Columbus, Ohio: Zaner-Bloser.
[37] Alavimoghaddam, B., Kheyrabadi, R., Rahimi, M., & Alavi, M. (2019). Prospect 3.
Tehran: Ministry of Education.
[38] Pallant. J. F. (2020). SPSS survival manual; A step by step guide to data analysis using
IBM SPSS (7th ed). UK: Routledge.
[39] Cohen, J.W. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[40] Zafar, S., & Meenakshi, K. (2012). Individual learner differences and second language
acquisition: A review. Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3, 639-646.
[41] Riding, R. J., & Buckle, C. F. (1990). Learning styles and training performance. Sheffield:
Training Agency.
[42] Johnson, S. D., & Aragon. S. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online
learning environments. New Directions for Adult Continuing Education, 100, 31-43.
[43] Renzulli. J. S. (1994). Schools for talent development: A practical plan for total school
improvement. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
[44] Everton, W. J., Mastrangelo, P. M., & Jolton, J. F. (2005). Personality correlates of
employees' personal use of work computers. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8, 143-53.
[45] Hsieh. S. W. (2011). Effects of cognitive styles on an MSN virtual learning companion
system as an adjunct to classroom instructions. Educational Technology & Society, 14,
161-174.
[46] Zarrinfard. S. (2020). The impact of a technology-enhanced flipped classroom versus
computer assisted instruction on vocabulary learning and grammar achievement of
language learners with different cognitive styles. [unpublished doctoral dissertation].
Tehran: Islamic Azad University. South Branch.
[47] Koehler, M. J, & Mishra, P. (2009). What is technological pedagogical content
knowledge?. CITE, 9, 60-70.
[48] Cheung, A. C., & Slavin, R. E. (2012). How features of educational technology
applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis. Educational Research
Review, 7(3), 198-215.
