پیوندهای مفید
اخبار و اعلانات
آمار
| تعداد نشریات | 41 |
| تعداد شماره‌ها | 1,113 |
| تعداد مقالات | 9,524 |
| تعداد مشاهده مقاله | 17,182,440 |
| تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله | 12,027,763 |
پدیدارنگاری پیامدهای فرقهگرایی در سازمانهای بخش عمومی | ||
| مدیریت سازمانهای دولتی | ||
| مقاله 5، دوره 10، شماره 4 (پیاپی 40)، آبان 1401، صفحه 71-84 اصل مقاله (1.42 M) | ||
| نوع مقاله: پیمایشی | ||
| شناسه دیجیتال (DOI): 10.30473/ipom.2022.60344.4430 | ||
| نویسندگان | ||
| مصطفی هادوی‌نژاد* 1؛ عادله الکوزهی2 | ||
| 1دانشیار، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه ولی‌عصر، رفسنجان، ایران. | ||
| 2کارشناس ارشد، گروه مدیریت، دانشگاه ولی‌عصر، رفسنجان، ایران.. | ||
| چکیده | ||
| تنوع در محیط کار، فرصت‌هایی را برای بالندگی سازمان به ارمغان می‌آورد. اما نه تنها گاه از این ظرفیت در سازمان‌‌ها استفاده نمی‌‌شود، بلکه گاه در برخی کشورها به آفاتی نظیر فرقهگرایی در سازمان نیز دچار می‌‌شود. این پژوهش با هدف رسیدن به فهم‌‌های متکثر دربارة تبعات فرقهگرایی در سازمان، به کاوش تجارب زیستة کارکنانی از سازمانهای دولتی ولایت هرات افغانستان با پدیدارنگاری پرداخته است. مشارکت‌کنندگان پژوهش 24 نفر از کارکنان 16 سازمان یادشده بودند که با روش نمونه‌‌گیری نوعی تا رسیدن به اشباع نظری به همکاری دعوت شده بودند. روش گردآوری داده‌‌ها انجام مصاحبه‌‌های عمیق بود. برای تحلیل داده‌‌های پژوهش از نرم‌‌افزار Maxqda استفاده شد. طبق یافته‌‌ها پنج ایستار متفاوت نسبت به پیامدهای فرقهگرایی در سازمان به دست آمدند که عبارت بودند از کنش‌‌های هنجارستیزانة اعضای فرقه، ناکامی‌‌ها و کنش‌‌های منفعلانة اعضای خارج از فرقه، ارتباطات بین‌‌فردی تعارض‌‌آلود، کژکارکردهای سازمانی و بی‌‌اعتمادی عمومی. در ادامه، طبقات بر اساس پیچیدگی سطح آنها، روی سلسله‌‌مراتبی با پنج سطح کنش‌‌های اعضای فرقه، کنش‌‌های اعضای خارج از فرقه، فرد، ارتباطات بین‌‌فردی، سازمان و فراسازمان قرار گرفتند و فضای نتیجه‌‌ای سلسله‌‌مراتبی را برای شیوه‌‌های متفاوت ادراک از پیامدهای پدیدة فرقهگرایی در سازمان رقم زدند. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها | ||
| فرقهگرایی؛ تنوع نیروی کار؛ پدیدارنگاری؛ افغانستان | ||
| عنوان مقاله [English] | ||
| The Phenomenography of Sectarianism’s Consequences in Organizations of Public Sector | ||
| نویسندگان [English] | ||
| Mostafa Hadavinejad1؛ Adeleh Alkozehi2 | ||
| 1Associate Professor, Department of Management, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran | ||
| 2Msc. Of Management, Department of Management, Vali-e-Asr University, Rafsanjan, Iran. | ||
| چکیده [English] | ||
| Diversity in the workplace provides opportunities for developing organizations. But not only is this capacity sometimes used in organizations, in some countries it also includes pests such as sectarianism in organization. The purpose of this study was to explore the lived experiences of employees from public organizations in Herat, Afghanistan –a proper context for sectarianism in a an effected counry by such a phenomenon, to gain diverse understandings about consequences of sectarianism in the organization through a phenomenography. Research participants were 24 employees from 16 mentioned organizations that were invited to the research project through typical sampling until theoretical saturation. The method of data collection was in-depth interviews. Maxqda software was used for data analysis. Based on the findings of the study, five different viewpoints toward the consequences of sectarianism in the organization were found, namely, in-parties’ anti-norm actions, out-parties’ frustrations and passive actions, conflicting interpersonal communication, organizational dysfunctions, and public distrust. Subsequently, based on their level of complexity, the classes were placed on a hierarchy with five levels (in-parties actions, Out-parties’ actions, individual, interpersonal communication, organization, and external environment of organization) and shaped the hierarchical outcome space for different ways of perceiving the consequences of the phenomenon of sectarianism in the organization. | ||
| کلیدواژه‌ها [English] | ||
| Sectarianism, Workforce Diversity, Phenomenography, Afghanistan | ||
| مراجع | ||
|
Al Wekhian, J. (2015). Conflict management styles in the workplace: A study of first generation Arab Muslim immigrants in the United States. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(11), 24-42. Bond, M. A., & Haynes, M. C. (2014). Workplace diversity: A social–ecological framework and policy implications. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8(1), 167-201. Brewer, J. (1992). Sectarianism and racism, and their parallels and differences. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 15(3), 352-364. Brewer, M. B. (2001). The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22(1), 115-125. Butcher, D., & Clarke, M. (2002). Organizational politics: The cornerstone for organizational democracy. Organizational Dynamics, 31(1), 35-46. Cartwright, R. (2002). Managing Diversity. Oxford: Capstone Publication. Creswell J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Boston: Pearson Education Inc. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. D’Netto, B., & Sohal, A. S. (1999). Human resource practices and workforce diversity: An empirical assessment. International Journal of Manpower, 20(8), 530-547. Danaeefard, H., & Kazemi, S. H. (2010). Promoting interpretive research in organization: Overview of Philosophical foundations and conduction process of phenomenography. Management Studies in Development and Evolution, 17(61), 121-147. (In persian) Dawes, C. T., & Fowler, J. H. (2009). Partisanship, voting, and the dopamine D2 receptor gene. The Journal of Politics, 71(3), 1157-1171. Dickson, D., & Hargie, O. (2006). Sectarianism in the Northern Ireland workplace. International Journal of Conflict Management, 17(1), 45-65. Dovidio, J. F., Gaertner, S. L., Kawakami, K., & Hodson, G. (2002). Why can’t we just get along? Interpersonal biases and interracial distrust. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 8(2), 88-102. Dynes, R. R. (1997). The consequences of sectarianism for social participation. Social Forces, 35(4), 331-334. Finlay, A. (1993). Sectarianism in the Workplace: the case of the Derry shirt industry 1868–1968. Irish Journal of Sociology, 3(1), 79-94. Forbes, L. H. (2008). Diversity is key to a world-class organization. Leadership and Management in Engineering, 8(1), 11-15. Geckil, T., & Tikici, M. (2016). Hospital employees’ organizational democracy perceptions and its effects on organizational citizenship behaviors. Asian Pacific Journal of Health Science, 3(2), 123-136. Gotsis, G., & Kortezi, Z. (2013). Ethical paradigms as potential foundations of diversity management initiatives in business organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 26(6), 948-976. Graham, P., Walsh, D., & McCartney, G. (2012). Shipyards and sectarianism: How do mortality and deprivation compare in Glasgow and Belfast?. Public Health, 126, 378-385. Hadian, H. (2009). ).Structural seakness of state-nation-building in Afghanistan: Geography and ethnicity. Rahbord, 18(51), 133-152. (In persian) Harrison, J. S., & Freeman, R. E. (2004). Special topic: Democracy in and around organizations: Is organizational democracy worth the effort?. The Academy of Management Executive, 18(3), 49-53. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604. Konrad, A. M. (2006). Leveraging workplace diversity in organizations. Organization Management Journal, 3(3), 164-189. Landells, E., & Albrecht, S. L. (2013). Organizational political climate: Shared perceptions about the building and use of power bases. Human Resource Management Review, 23(4), 357-365. Liechty, J., & Clegg, C. (2001). Moving beyond Sectarianism: Religion, Conflict, and Reconciliation in Northern Ireland. Dublin: Columba Press. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. CA: Sage Publications. Macrae, C. N., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). Social cognition: Thinking categorically about others. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 93-120. McVeigh, R. (1995). Cherishing the children of the nation unequally: sectarianism in Ireland. In: Clancy, P., Drudy, S., Lynch, K., & O’Dowd, L. (Eds). Irish Society: Sociological Perspectives. Dublin: Institute of Public Administration, 620-652. Ozgen, C., Nijkamp, P., & Poot, J. (2017). The elusive effects of workplace diversity on innovation. Papers in Regional Science, 96(S1), 29-49. Paolini, S., Hewstone, M., Cairns, E., & Voci, A. (2004). Effects of direct and indirect cross-group friendships on judgments of Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland: The mediating role of an anxiety-reduction mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(6), 770-786. Patrick, H. A., & Kumar, V. R. (2012). Managing Workplace Diversity: Issues and Challenges. Sage Open, 2(2), 1-16. Pausch, M. (2014). Workplace democracy: From a democratic ideal to a managerial tool and back. The Innovation Journal, 19(1), 1-26. Ramos, M. R., Hewstone, M., Barreto, M. & Branscombe, N. R. (2016). The opportunities and challenges of diversity: Explaining its impact on individuals and groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(7), 793-806. Sardarnia, Kh., Hosseini, S. M. (2014). The social challenges of modern state building in Afghanistan. World Politics, 3(3), 37-63. (in Persian) Schein, E. (2004). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Shafiei, N., Eqbal, A. (2010). The riddle of democracy in Afghanistan. Journal of Political and International Research, 2(3), 197-222. (in Persian) Sinclair, L., & Kunda, Z. (2000). Motivated stereotyping of women: She’s fine if she praised me but incompetent if she criticized me. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(11), 1329-1342. Smyth, M., & Hamilton, J. (2004). The human costs of the troubles. In: Hargie, O., & Dickson, D. (Eds), Researching the Troubles: Social Science Perspectives on the Northern Ireland Conflict. Edinburgh: Mainstream Publishing, 15-36. Starks, G. L. (2006). Managing Conflict in Public Organizations: Conflict Can be Recognized, Tackled Organizations. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. Ullah, M., & Ali, Z. (2019). Sectarianism at workplace in Gilgit. South Asian History and Culture, 10(1), 64-77. | ||
|
آمار تعداد مشاهده مقاله: 182 تعداد دریافت فایل اصل مقاله: 206 |
||