Beyond convention: Enriched argument in L2 Writing through Mobile-assisted reading

Bazerman, C. Intertextualities: Volosinov, Bakhtin, literary theory, and literary studies. In: Ball, A.F, Freedman , S.V (eds.) Bahktinian perspectives on language, literacy, and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004. p. 53-65.

Booton, S.A, hodgkiss, A, murphy, V.A. The impact of mobile application features on children’s language and literacy learning: a systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2021; 33(2): 1-30.

Cerezo, R, calderon, V, Romero, C. A holographic mobile-based application for practicing pronunciation of basic English vocabulary for Spanish speaking children. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2019;124(1): 13-25.

Chang, C.C, Warden, C.A, Liang, C, chou, P.N. Performance, cognitive load, and behaviour of technolog-assisted English listening learning: From CALL to MALL. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2018; 34(2): 105-114.

Cotos, E, chung, Y.R. Functional language in curriculum genres: Implications for testing international teaching assistants. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2019;41(2): 1-21.

Crossley, S.A, Mcnamara, D.S. Say more and be more coherent: How text elaboration and cohesion can increase writing quality. Journal of Writing Research. 2016;7(3): 351-370.

Duman, G, Orhon, G, gedik, N. Research trends in mobile assisted language learning from 2000 to 2012. ReCall. 2015;27(2): 197-216.

Ferretti, R.P., Fan, Y. Argumentative writing. In: Macarthur, C.A, Graham, S, Fitzgerald. J (eds.) Handbook of writing research . New York, NY: Guilford; 2016. p. 301-315.

Fletcher, R. Mentor author, mentor texts: Short texts, craft notes, and practical classroom uses. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann; 2011.

Galbraith, D. Writing as discovery. Teaching and Learning Writing. 2009;2(6): 5-26.

Gallagher, K. Write like this: Teaching real-world writing through modeling and mentor texts. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers; 2011.

Gutiérrez-Colón, M., Frumuselu, A. D., Curell, H. Mobile-assisted language learning to enhance L2 reading comprehension: A selection of implementation studies between 2012–2017. Interactive Learning Environments.2020; 28: 1-9.

Hillocks, G. Teaching argument writing, grades 6–12: Supporting claims with relevant evidence and clear reasoning. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann: 2011.

Hirvela, A., & Du, Q. “Why am I paraphrasing?” Undergraduate ESL writers’ engagement with source-based academic writing and reading. Journal of English for Academic Purposes. 2013; 12: 87–98.

Hyland, K. Stance and engagement: a model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies. 2005; 7(2): 173-192.

Hyland, K. Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2007; 16(3): 148–164.

Jacobs, H. L, .Zingraf, S.A, Wormuth, D.R, Hartfiel, V. F,. Hughey, J. B. Testing ESL Composition: A Practical approach. Rowley, MA: Newbury House; 1981.

Jesson, R., McNaughton, S., Parr, J.M. Drawing on intertextuality in culturally diverse classrooms: Implications for transfer of literacy knowledge. English Teaching: Practice and Critique. 2011; 10 (2): 65–77.

Keck, C. Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing. 2014; 25:4–22.

Kessler, M. Supplementing mobile-assisted language learning with reflective journal writing: a case study of Duolingo users’ metacognitive awareness. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2021; 34 (3): doi: 10.1080/09588221.2021.1968914

Kibler, A. K., Hardigree, C. Using Evidence in L2 Argumentative Writing: A Longitudinal Case Study Across High School and University. Language Learning. 2016; 67(1): 75–109.

Klimova, B., Zamborova, K. Use of Mobile Applications in Developing Reading Comprehension in Second Language Acquisition—A Review Study. Education Sciences. 2020; 10(12): 1-11.

Kukulska-Hulme, A. A lifelong perspective on mobile language learning. In: Mogana, V., Kukulska-Hulme, A. (eds.) Mobile assisted language learning across educational contexts. Routledge Focus on Applied Linguistics: Routledge; 2021, p.122–133

Kukulska-Hulme, A., Traxler, J. Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers. London: Routledge; 2005.

Lai, W. L. A new approach to teaching academic writing: How philosophers can contribute to educating young scientists. Journal of the Graduate School of Letters. 2010; 5: 81-87.

Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., Jia, C. Toward a flipped 5E model for teaching problem-solution writing in ESL courses: A two-year longitudinal experiment. Language Learning & Technology.2022; 26(1): 1–40.

Lan, Y. J., Lyu, B.-N., Chin, C. K. Does a 3D immersive experience enhance Mandarin writing by CSL students? Language Learning & Technology. 2019; 23(2): 125–144.

Lee, S.Y., Gloria Lo, Y., Chin, T. Practicing multiliiteracies to enhance EFL learners’ meaning making process and language development: a multimodal Problem-based approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2021; 34 (1-2): 1–26.

Lenhart, A., Arafeh, S., Smith, A., Macgill, A. Writing, technology and teens.   Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2008.

Lin, C.-C., Lin, V., Liu, G.-Z., Kou, X., Kulikova, A., Lin, W. Mobile-assisted reading development: a review from the activity theory perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2020; 33 (8): 833-864.

Liu, F., Stapleton, P. Counterargumentation at the primary level: An intervention study investigating the argumentative writing of second language learners. System. 2020; 89; 1-15.

Maas, M. J., Hughes, J. M. Virtual, augmented and mixed reality in K–12 education: A review of the literature. Technology, Pedagogy and Education. 2020; 29(2): 231–249.

Mei, W. S. Creating a contrastive rhetorical stance; investigating the strategy of problematization in students' argumentation. RELC Journal. 2006; 37(3): 329-353.

Mills, K., Unsworth, L. The literacy curriculum: A critical review. In: Wyse, D., Hayward, L., & Pandya, Z. (eds.) The Sage handbook of literacy, pedagogy and assessment. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2016, p. 621-637.

Mitchell, S. Putting argument into the mainstream. In: Mitchell, s., Andrews, R. (eds.), Learning to argue in higher education. Portsmouth, NH: Boyton/Cook; 2000. P, 146-154.

Phelan, J., Halpern, F. Writing effective journal essay introductions Inside Higher Education. [Online]. Available from: https://www.insidehighered.com/advice/2018/05/16/how-craft-introductions-journal- essays-opinion [Accessed 25 September 2022].

Purpura, J. E. Assessing meaning. In: Shohamy, E., Or, L (eds.) Encyclopedia of language and education: Language testing and assessment. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing; 2017, p. 37-52.

Rapanta, C., Garcia-Mila, M., Gilabert, S. What is meant by argumentative competence? An integrative review of methods of analysis and assessment in education. Review of Educational Research. 2013; 83(4): 483–520.

Şad, S. N., Özer, N., Yakar, Ü., Öztürk, F. Mobile or hostile? Using smartphones in learning English as a foreign language. Computer Assisted Language Learning.2022; 35 (5): 1031-1057.

Samsiah, B., & Azidah, A. Z. Adoption and application of mobile learning in the education industry. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013; 90, 720-729.

Schleppegrell, M. J.The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 2004.

Shin, D., Kwon, S. K., Lee, Y. The effect of using online language-support resources on L2 writing performance. Language Testing in Asia. 2021; 11(1): 1-23.

Shree, B. J., Parilah, M. S., Nor, P. S., Rosseni, D., Rashidah, R., Juhaida, A. A. User needs analysis in learning argumentative writing via mobile platform. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2014; 118: 198-205.

Stockwell, G. Using mobile phones for vocabulary activities: Examining the effect of the Language Learning & Technology. 2010; 14(2): 95-110.

Sukmawan, s., Setyowati, L., El-Sulukiyyah, A. The effect of authentic materials on writing performance across different levels of proficiency. International Journal of Language Education. 2021; 5 (1):515-527.

Sun, Q., Soden, B. (2021). The representation of source use in academic writing textbooks. ELT Journal. 2021; 75 (3): 183-193.

Swales, J. M. Variation in citational practice in a corpus of student biology papers from parenthetical plonking to intertextual storytelling. Written   2014; 31: 118–141.

Toulimn, S. Return to reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 2001.

Tragant, E., Pinyana, À., Mackay, J., Andria, M. Extending language learning beyond the EFL classroom through WhatsApp. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2021; 34 (1).

Traxler, J. Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having writ.... The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning. 2007; 8(2): 1-12.

Tse, P., Hyland, K. Gender and discipline: Exploring metadiscourse variation in academic book reviews. In: Hyland, K., Bondim M. (eds.), Academic discourse across disciplines. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang; 2006. P. 177-202.

Van Weijen, D., Rijlaarsdam, G., van den Bergh, H. Source use and argumentation behavior in L1 and L2 writing: a within-writer comparison. Reading and Writing. 2019; 32: 1635-1655.

Wang, S., Smith, S. (2013). Reading and grammar learning through mobile phones. Language Learning & Technology. 2013; 7(3): 117-134.

Xue, S., Churchill, D. Educational affordances of mobile social media for language teaching and learning: a Chinese teacher’s perspective. Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2022; 35(4): 918-947.

[55]  Yu, J., Zhou, X., Yang, X., Hu, J. Mobile-assisted or paper-based? The influence of the reading medium on the reading comprehension of English as a foreign

language, Computer Assisted Language Learning. 2022; 35 (1-2): 217-245.